Search results

Acquisition? Christ, English standards have slipped.

Did you see my old car lounging about?

Everyone has a different tolerance to it, some people don't even notice it. I find it worse at night, but I'm overly fussy on that count.

I think it's more that you see sooooooo many dephasers go that it's just sensible. Everytime I'm over there one seems to be playing up.

Peripheral visual distortions FTL.

Look out for the epic flame red ph1!!

What if it's a total loss write off? How can it be tested re MOT? If the answer was that cut and dried, there wouldn't be the never ending debate on forums. Getting stopped isn't really a concern. Insurace however, is.

Re: iPhone "must have" apps Yep, I ran tomtom on my 3gs just fine.

Re: iPhone "must have" apps You don't.

Re: iPhone "must have" apps Pfffft. Welcome to yesterday Cwis. I love the photo navigation.

I'm amazed that someone other than Jordi is on my ignore list.

I've got both copilot and tom-tom. The routing and traffic alerts are much better with tom-tom, but given the price that's normal.

No one with an ounce of sense would post a video like that. And if they did, they'd get the same response. Just tiresome now.

I'm sorry, but I'd be gutted to watch a video back and see my driving at that standard. But he's young with bugger all experience, maybe if he posted at such (as opposed to his Billy big bollox attitude) everyone would get on with him. But posting this s**t, telling people to learn how to...

Racing line?? A--------pmsl.

Video is good, graphics not really.

Tiltshift is quite good

At least get an itg if you're getting a filter.

Fair enough. But don't expect a positive reaction when you do drive in a stupid manner, and then post videos while confessing to dangerous driving. You won't get a kind response on any non-chave forum.

I phrased it wrong, road-worthy instead of road-legal.

Only chavvy and s**t when you have it sounding broken. Not all remaps make you look like a prick.

I'd have to agree. They may sit a bit high, but they look great.

Only counts if your car works;).

A cat back system wouldn't render your car non-roadworthy. You know the score with insurance, not declaring is no excuse, I believe the term they use when you take out a policy is declaration of truth. You haven't told them you're removed the cat, as said you can have a manifold back system with...

Weird thread.

If your car won't pass an MOT, it's not road legal. If it's not road legal, you're not insured. You've not actually declared that you aren't running a cat, for all they know you're running a sports cat. For the small difference it makes, it's not worth the potential hassle.

I'll go halves with you?

He didn't have an R27, did he?

It's such a grey area, I don't think I've read anything that conclusively says yay/no. For me, not worth the hassle. Just obliterate the inside's of the cat. Will look fine on inspection.

With a great big get-out clause. Car has to be road legal.