Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Tbh, it's not a bad looking car - ridiculous wheels, but it looks quite tidy.
That said, he needs to stop advertising it as 220bhp - because he's either a complete and utter plank, or a lying cocker.
It's not half bad otherwise..who knows it might even sell if he's more realistic about it
I'd be inclined to stay away from the Sammy 3d panel and get the Asus one...If this 22" is anything to go by.
The Asus is only 24" but the colours are brilliant...and next to no ghosting with 3D
without even reading the thread. Short answer, yes they are good for nowt.
I've been in the industry a long time and they have (next to Hitachi deskstars and the former Maxtor, now Seagate) the worst failure rate
Western Digital have proved to be the most reliable in my experience
When your cars up and running Nick come to the next TDF RR day and compare then.. ;)
What you're saying is basically the only part of the argument that holds strength.. the drive you get from throttle bodies is what sets these two kits apart... or at least that's the way it would seem!
cams and itb's don't blow F4Rs up. These things take 250bhp with stock internals, so a harsher cam profile and a bit of extra air drawn in the front isn't going to make a massive difference. Of course any increase in power is going to decrease engine life by a small %..
Laine has had past...
Re: My Phase 1 ITB Daily Runner
Tis true, not that any of it's worth f' all :D
hopefully before August as I'd like to get it mapped in time. I'm booking Brands and want to take it to CS Sat at the end of July.. I'm sure his Lordship can manage that!