Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Power sounds just about right for the mods done
172 bhp +
Ik = 10
full cat back = 10
superchip = 8
Yep spot on :cry:
Haaaaaaaaa Harrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ha
My baby has a few more tweks on it than his but is still not redy yet and its the same alloy bonnet and green shift light one as his. It on a w reg with 53 k on the clock.
That must have been one of the slow 172 ones that are knocking about. The yellow beast does not have a chance:oops: : )
[Edited by mr bognor on 22 October 2004 at 10:05pm]
You sound like a good bloke Adam and dont want to upset you and our relationship by giving you a right pasting on the strip ;) + Where did you say Santa pod was the far ist i have driven is Portsmouth but i do have the week end off ???
Yep good point it is very plain from the rear with only the sport logo to hint of the power its got . If you no your cars i sticks out with the oz alloys and front end and the silver colour. Your right its not as in your face as some clios ie v6 ect.
Is it a turbo no Sh*t wow now thats nice. Same block thats in the GT4 i think still would be no match for the old Clio ;)
[Edited by mr bognor on 15 October 2004 at 4:58pm]
Fun as fu*k to say its raw is spot on. Put like this say in a golf it will be nice and refined and smooth. In the mk 1 172 its just raw and so un refined ie it just dumps 172 horses at the front wheeles and says have that. The only car that scares the sh*t out of me in 2 gear.
Right you are . I think The mk 2 is more refined has more toys big er alloys ect. and the mk 1 is more raw think top gears Clarkson said it had lost the savage ness of the mk 1 .