Search results

lmao at Chad!

markh - thatd be 139.5mph

Feckin hell, that must have taken some doing. Good on you for sticking with the original badges though (and not putting 2.0 16v on it!).

:D

But against the opposition we should be honoured that they took it at all!

These: http://erc.qmuc.ac.uk/cliosport/file.php?image=1056816769__nice_wheels_bk_racing_238.jpg

Another Paul Clio 16v who lives near the Dronfield bypass?!

Theyll probably try and flog people the alloys as an option when they buy the car.

Because its a Renault :p

Temperature sensor!

Ill have a think about it! Cheers, Rhys.

Ah, thats okay then. Carry on Si.....

Take the car to a website? Still dont understand. :confused::confused::confused:

How can Si be going to a website? :confused:

They have their own place? :confused:

RTOC?

http://www.k-tecracing.com/show_product.asp?id=800http://www.k-tecracing.com/show_product.asp?id=800 Seems a bit steep for 2 bolts, but I like the idea and want to try it out. Is there a cheap workaround?

262bhp then? :p Just put in BP 98. Was expensive. Cant notice a difference!

JJ - Any price on that yet? Need to know how many pennies Ill need. Am very tempted as Ive got to lower her soon. Rhys

142mph in the 172 (conformed with GPS) and 134mph indicated in the Williams (131.5mph on GPS).

AFAIK, the AP22 and the G-Tech both use accelerometers (measuing G-Force). Id like one of those GPS data loggers, but theyre several hundred quid :-(

Its alright, isnt it :D

Cuppy, is that 150 for just the fitting? If its meant to be that easy could you not just do it yourself?

Craggys VTS has been proved time and again to be rapid. It was running 14.7s (same as a V6 clio the same day!) all day at york last week. Im more pleased that I can keep up with him! Im very keen to take the MK1 to York on the 27th July as I think that it can put in a good time. Renault didnt...

Dont think so. MK2 is a fly by wire throttle. MK1 has the bog standard cable. Im totally happy that my current 172 is doing what it should do, power wise. Dont car if its a 162 or a 172 or a 182. All I know is that it shifts like buggery and the old one that I had didnt. Is your 172 still...

Wish Renault would get their build quality sorted out. I cant really put into words how much better the engine in my MK1 is compared to my MK2. 5.5k at rev limiter?! Id be asking for a replacement car if I were you :sick:

Thatd be me then! Someone mentioned stiffer roll bars on the MK2. Dunno if thats true, but the handling just doesnt quite feel as solid on the MK1. Still love it though :D

Tis but a scratch. Bit of cutting paste should see it right. For the sunstrip, maybe try the Renault Sports Club website?! Just a thought!

I have! Well, weve got both actually. People do actually look at the 172. Ive caught people peeking in through the windows of both cars quite recently! As far as drivability and fun goes, be prepared for a bit of a shock with the handling. When you first get out of a Williams and into a 172...

Maybe if Renault had the fallback of an airfield full of cars, theyd be able to spend more time building new ones without squeaks, rattles and other such "characteristics".