Search results

unless they are seperate subnets there is no need for routers and i couldnt imagine they would be seperate subnets cant see much need anyway instead of using routers you would be better off with one layer 3 switch and vlan it

In a network, a backbone is a larger transmission path into which smaller lines feed i agree but it needs to be consolodated first by a switch

for all intents and purposes they way its drawn every pc could connect straight to the swich like it does in room 1

oh and whats providing dns in your diagram ;)

in real life you would have a cabinate in each one with a switch in each going back to a centeral room 4th room making it a star

his pic has 3 switches all in the same cabinate and no other switches that i can tell unless those little boxes are switches but he doesnt say and in room 1 it says workstations are wired to the switch so there would be a max of 2 backbones if those little boxes are switches

in text cab to cab = backbone usually fiber cab to pc = structured cat 5/6 ethernet inter switch in cab = either fiber uplinks or cat 5/6 inside switch=what ever the switch manufacturer wants but very very fast also called a backbone

dont laugh only have paint on this laptop lol

and on the link you posted the bus topology is for bnc ring is for tolken ring mainly(long dead) (if used with ethernet it costs ALOT) there is another type of topology called the piece of s**t i have here topology that is basically a tree mixed with a mesh lol

tbh in the pic you posted there is no backbone except the internal backbones in the switches all the switches would be uplinked via trunks (quitepossible it is fiber tho) and the workstations are all connected via structured cabling back to the switches so to sum it up your pic has no back bone

its alright next version of windows is expected in 2009 :)

the backbone refers to the connection between to cabinates usually (switch to switch)

yes but there is more scope for detail in it than 1080p might be better with digital cinema 4k tho (even then its still scanned from a film reel) but it does depend on the original film stock 16mm film wont be as detailed as 35mm and 70mm

yes mr rasclart is right film is a higher resolution well it has no resolution thats down the the machine that scans the film

to be honest films that are filmed in hd are possibly of worse quality than those taken from film

550 gets you a 32" tosh that looks good in lounge or bedroom

i remember the days when quark ruled them all was back in about 93 tho ;) you wouldnt use anything else back then for pre press s**t

340 on 54 litres so 28.4 mpg in my 2.4 accord thats taking it easy going too and from work so a full tank id get 406 ish

is it on a linux box tho ?

thats why i worked it out using combined mpg ;)

erm sorta lol also im just bored i think i have decided what to go for tho but i will never mention it on her as i will get stoned alive ;)

i cant calculate that tho unless i have the car ;) i could work out miles per tank based on urban and extra urban but thats not of a huge value tho id have thought

right im just doing a spreadsheet at the moment with lots of different car calculations in it i have comparing 2 cars to see whats most economical using mpg purchase price fuel cost and car tax costs mpg litres per 100km killometers per litre miles per tank gallons miles per tank litre is...

its national lampoon ;)

depends on your kit tho :)

not a big problem the whole race thing in york tho is it bud down your way it may be a different tho as you point out i wouldnt have said there would be much need to use a palm print it would also cost more than a finger print scanner (we did look at retana but that cost a bit too much)

it could be either tbh if your not happy send it back

erm well they seem to be working ok at the mo altho the network cards in ours just deceided to stop working so when one bloke had been waiting for a crane for 3 weeks we knew something was up lol at first we found it a bit of a problem getting people to use them propperly but they are slowly...

yes