Search results

-0,4 degrees and about 0 the other side, IIRC.

right rear camber seems very different to left rear, don't think this is the way it's supposed to be

went last night to a car park and had some fun with the car but then seen this an wondered if some negative camber would help.. you can see how much flex the tyre suffered, was wondering if I could throw in some camber bolts on the stock dampers do you think 1-1,2 neg camber on the front would...

"they are black, round and say Michelin on the side...." you have to use your imagination it seems...

no way!...

I used a wire brush, paint thinner to clean them up and 2 coats of hammerite. they looked good until 2 weeks ago when did a bed in session and covered them in brake dust lol

you sure pads are 90 from k-tec? looks like 130 to me.. http://www.k-tecracing.com/show_product.asp?id=2346&catid=1&appid=2&pic=2

wow! good thing they make them in 16" pics please! ;)

PS3's are the replacement for the PS2, not the PE2. maybe there is a PE3 on the way but not sure about that

some megane rs guys say they're lighter and have better wet grip than PS2's but can't understand why the clio 1*2 boys keep wondering about PS3's as michelin probably won't do them in 16"sizes as they never did with the PS2's

yeah I don't think they will do them in 1*2 sizes, as they never did with the previous pilot sports

if you're planning on lowering get a wheel with the closest offset to 45, thus you'll prevent rubbing on the arches (and even so it may appear but it will be smoother and easier do get rid off). so get the trophy wheels :D

bump?..

if you're talking lightweight then a single back-box with 2wo exit tail-pipes is the way fwd. ktr/janspeed/yozza/orbisound look light enough

on the front people are getting the rubbing even with 195/50 r15. on the rear yeah you could go larger

there are plenty of threads on these coilies. they had pretty good reviews so far considering the price

they are too big for a car that already has tyre rubbing issues (when lowered). 195/45 r16 is the std size, although for track use 195/50 r15 are the best option

1-1,5 mm clearance is what I filed them too

clearly with the shims on these pads won't go in, with them removed, a little file needed compound wise, they should be the same I guess

thanks fred! good info there as I can see the 565 has a groove in the middle? my 406's have that groove although not shown in the drawing. I bought the pads from k-tec as they had them in the kit with the HC discs at a reasonable price. good to know what the differences are, this thread may as...

would like to know some day what are the differences between 565 and 406's (the official diferences I mean). a ferodo employee has to make an account around here lol p.s: FACT is I had to file them despite k-tec said that it wouldn't be necessary as they are the correct part no. so it seems like...

well they needed to be filed down a bit, and now they started to bite an to squeak aswell :) not bothered though ;)

you can spread the tailpipes (this is adjustable) if they aren't already at their max and then try to re-adjust.

always funny seeing fred trashing the milltek's :))

as I can see your problem was that it wouldn't fit high enough.. just like mine. this second solution seems better than the clip.

this is normal

I don't think he meant it idles at 2k, only for a few moments before dropping to 1,5k then 1k

.. don't think so, that sounds like intake noise, being viewed from the front. but anyway, i'm expecting opinions on the caf routing and so silicon elbow-does it worth 70 quid or just leave the system as it is?

BUMP! also wish to thank the guys at kamracing for quick delivery :)

anyone running these bolts on the std shocks? pics? thx!