Search results

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project hopefully geesus will let me know about his emulator trick....im hoping that will mean the immobiliser is sorted via hardware so it can be mapped whenever and wherever without re-activating the fooking immobiliser too!

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project I just replied to you, lol

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Think hes out testing a set of clocks that are untouched at the moment to see what the actual limiter is at.....hopefully find out shortly!

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Ive had the casing off the ECU....the immobiliser must have been removed by software only. The board is 100% intact, no changes or anything been touched... So basically now I know that it is the immobiliser that stopping the car from starting. Cant do...

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Who knows....ive no idea whats going on now! Apparently the ECU is now immobilised again (as rstuner cant read half the stuff, nor can it write to it), and I dont have a spare etc.....Stuck with no car :(

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Saying that, if its software, they managed to put the complete wrong one on....the 1.4 crap. For all we know yet, Matteh's might have some random map on too, his was done at the ECU clinic, with his 6k cold and 6.6k warm limiter....Im sure we will find out...

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project I have already had a few replies off them after a few emails were sent, the first being how they acctually remove the immobiliser....I got a completely unrelated reply, obviously trying to avoid the point I was asking about it seems. The second email was...

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Flashed with the correct file yesterday (A300_35FF), and now the car wont start. Fuel pump primes, cranks over, just dosent fire into life. Either one of two things has happened....1. The immobiliser has somehow come back (Unsure of how it was taken off...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newzbin

Would anyone be so kind to invite me if they have a spare invite? :approve: Thanks if anyone does!

stone cold not been run for 2-3 hours....plus, I flashed it with the GroupN one just before those screenshots, so thats not the problem. Its just after I flashed it, it wouldnt start, then come to try and put it back with the backup, and it wont let me....fail!

No, as I dont think it was 'de-immobilised' software wise. Even if it was, I can just reflash the software that was on it (1.4 thing) when the RSTuner decides to work again... PLUS...it must still be 'de-immobilised', as the fuel pump primes on ignition...

meh, saving my callouts FTW lol..... ...Pump is priming on ignition, but I dont think its running when cranking (cant tell for certain though), sure thing is, it dosent want to run... Henk, if you see this....for some reason the VCI number in 'about' has changed from what it was earlier too :S

As said, fuel pump primes but I get nothing fireing up...I thought, oh, il restore my original ECU .rst (backup)....But now the software is saying 'Could not gain security access' blah blah again. So im stuck at the moment. I also tried flashing the OEM file from the site, A300_3504.rst....But...

Ok nevermind, I just realised what Henk was saying, me being stupid wrote the backup I had made of the ECU, back onto the ECU, so nothing had changed....doh. Anyway, I just flashed the 'Group N .rst' file onto the ECU, 'A300 35FF', as said earlier, and now the car wont start. The programming...

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Im waiting for someone with RSTuner knowledge into files to reply in my other thread lol

All I need to know is: What .rst/.cal/file(s) do I need to write (ECU and/or CAL) to get the ECU back to 100% Standard 172 Ph1 (CB0M).... If anyone can tell me I might be getting somewhere lol :)

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project J even, oops typo ;)

Ive never understood this....my engine is Cb0m....i thought you could only put on the ones that match your engine code....Also, all the numbers before and after, what are they associated with? Also, write ecu/write cal, whats the difference?

How do you mean, I got the grp_n file off the site and flashed it with that? What do I need to program onto it?

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project K7P 700

I just flashed it with the A300_35FF (grp n) using 'Write CAL', and the limiter is still at 6k, cant really feel if its much different... As you can see the top one it flashed successfully, but I dont know what im looking for... Is it the .rst standard software I need to flash, using 'Write...

Nice, spotted these before on Vimeo, remember it well from when we went :)

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project *apparently* flashing the map dosent have anything to do with the immobiliser, but the software may have, two different things I think?! Ive sent an email back to the ECU clinic (contacted them earlier today), but i doubt anyone will admit flashing it...

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project No idea....maybe when the immobiliser was removed at the ECU Clinic they flashed the wrong map onto it....beyond me!

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Only time the ECU has been touched is at the ECU Clinic IIRC, doubt the previous owner of the car it was in wanted that map.... Just hoping if I flash it with the standard software/map the immobiliser stays away

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project Well big thanks to Henk for checking the ECU software/Cal of my current ECU. Oh dear, how the hell has a 172 ECU ended up with a K7J software running on it (1.4 I think)!

Re: Mk1 172 Hybrid Track Car Project We decided not to risk mapping it via RST yet due to the immobiliser that has been removed from the ECU, it *may* wipe it off. Ive just sent henk a copy of my current ECU software, and cal file, and hes going to test it and see what we get back :)

How can I send this software to you? Backup the ECU or...? Dials are the valver items, and are just running off an output from the ECU, they have no interaction

Well ive just emailed the place that unlocked my ECU (ECU Clinic), to ask him what process he uses to remove the immobiliser (Software or Hardware)...if its hardware its probably safe to re-flash the unit's software, if not....well il go from there when I get an answer back