Search results

Lols! Very impressed! I'll reply to your text in a bit! :o

Not really, it's just a really modern SRP so on another occasion ie better weather a nice coat of Amigo and Lsp would be cool.

I would just go Tripple then Lsp mate, they have glazing properties anyway. Amigo will add to it slightly and make it slicker but it's an extra step.

Yeah you really need to do everything perfect mate. Email the companies in question and research them. Application and prep is absolute key. Polishing then car-pro eraser ipa etc then apply, nothing else needed.

Indeed. I forgot trolling was a lost art.

We've established i'm wrong and Ford were lying because they built an underpowered car due to lack of cash.

No imo. The water behavior can't touch Ceramic sealants. They are boring because you don't actually have to do anything except wash the car. To be fair mate you can do as you wish. The strong swirl resistant (to a point) will still be a great base underneath and glazes/waxes/sealants. :)

So you're saying Ford couldn't get anymore than 150bhp out of a 2.0 litre petrol engine?

It's not a debate, it stopped being that when people decide to pick parts of information to suit their argument.

Exo isn't a ceramic coating mate but I see where you're coming from. Personally i'd discount the new C1+, it needs other products to make it work well. Although in saying that C1+ is a good base but quite fussy. If I was to recommend any at the moment it would be Cquartz/Cquartz UK. The UK...

Were you dropped on your head as a child?

No, no. Just any Clio evererer made.

It doesn't. It's not as good as any Clio. I was wrong.

We're not even debating the OP anymore. Someone compared the Fiesta to the Clio. As much as the Fiesta can compete with the 182 it wasn't intentionally aimed at competing with it, hence the fact that they restricted a 2.0 litre petrol engine to produce only 150bhp!!!!!! So you're comparing...

Your one was a shed.

The Clio does punch above it's weight. So does the Meg. The Clio was in Ecoty against things that cost 1/4 million pounds.

Seems really cheap although it's not an R26 so maybe the reason. Sounds anal and looks proper clean. Great car for someone.

Oh hi... Any the point stands. The ST brand doesn't try to compete with the Renault R.S. range. If it does then it could be said it's punching above it's weight.

I am. Me, luke, Dave and many others have tried to explain it for years. I usually give up by now. :o

My new car..... Lols! They look oem anyway. I didn't even notice a difference!

So one of the world's best motoring journalists and Ford's marketing man said it... yet still CS knows better. I doff my hat chaps.

My new car..... Nice machine mate. A little too "race" for me but awesome!

5 minutes in, Mr Harris states the RS is the competitor to the Megane and VXR. He's God right?

Yes. Mk1. Being pedantic you could call it a Mk2.

It wasn't aimed at any age group. It's cheaper to tax, insure and fuel than a Clio and has less horse power. If that's competing then they're really bad at it. They physically restricted the breathing of the car to keep the Bhp down. You'll notice the Focus ST mk1 runs a restricted RS unit...

Why because we're having a debate and discussion? If you don't like it, leave. So CS knowledge > Ford marketing.

It's a fact. If it was competing with the Clio it would have had much more BHP from the restricted 2.0 litre engine. Surely you can see that? A Clio 200 can keep up with a MK2 FRS on a twisty road, it means jack s**t imo. A Clio 200 can keep up with a Lambo on a B road, it means nothing.

Nice mate, the colour is pretty special but the attention that it attracts can be unwanted.

The steering in even the 1.25 is immense, the ST will be a stunning drive, slow or not!

Nope, i'm trying to say you'd buy one for different reasons to the Megane/Vxr. You can directly compare the FRS to them if you wish. Look at the new Focus ST, it's aimed at a different market. Ford have stated this on umpteen occasions yet people don't listen.