Search results

my past experences (not racing on a public road of course!;)) are that the 106 gti's are quicker.... not by much but do just about take it!! but if it's a choice of the two it's always the Clio for looks etc :)

that's a tough call that is..... overall i prefer the Clio 16v as it has the looks, power and comfort. but to drive i prefer the 205 as i think this is more of a drivers car...being the old skool rally **** it is...making it more fun!! but for a everyday car i'd choose the 16v as i'm doing...

brilliant.....cheers mate :)

yes i'd also agree with that...but can you get one for £23k? that's not a bag of sh*te that is!?

only nice thing about that in my opinion is the paint job...matt black :D the rest is shocking i reckon!! but fair enough if it's running mahoosive power to go with the looks!!?

i'd personally think about a Honda S2000 if it was me with the money to spend!? got the looks,style and definitely the power...lovely cars if it was out of the cars you have said it'll be a newer shape black Clio v6 with the silver/grey side vents!!!? but you are right about the power..not that...

Thanks for the welcomes :) quick question...am i not able to reply to a topic in the for sale section?? do you have to be a full member type thing?? seen wazza16valver selling his 16v and sounds mint but can't reply!? Thanks people ;)

Hello everyone, i've just signed up so thought i'd say hello... i currently drive a Pug 205 Gti but looking for another 16v as i love them!! i'm also pretty familiar with them as i've owned 2 Clio 16v's and a phase 2 172..... which unfortunatly has been wrote off! :( anyway i'm going to...

on my first 16v i had 17" OZ Super Leggs which looked lovely in my opinion, and on my second one i had the 16" 172 sport alloys which also looked really good... but no pics to show unfortunately!! :(