I’m sticking up for magazine tests.
There’s one key advantage that outweighs everything IMO:
* Back to back test is as accurate as you can get. Consumers are normally comparing a brand new tyre to a 3 year old tyre and trying to remember what the old tyre was like when it was new on roads that now have more potholes, a car that has more worn out suspension, different alignment and driven in years with potentially different weather or usage. Doesn’t matter how much of a car enthusiast you are, testing something in different conditions 3 years apart is not.
Sure there are a few cons, but most can be mitigated with judgement, or exist in owner reviews too:
* Risk of bias (also exists on forums!)
* No info on how long they last (most owner reviews can be ignored as the car, usage & driving style is not mentioned or irrelevant and no-one measures tread depth at point of replacement)
* Personally I think they do a poor job of explaining that all the tyres are probably safe/acceptable.
Tyres are not purely subjective. Stopping distance, rolling resistance & noise are measurable. Even feel & balance partially translates into lap time, though it would be nice to see reviewers using something like a vbox to measure lateral acceleration.
What is massively subjective is the word “decent” lol. Everyone has different requirements and a different tolerance for spending that extra £20 per corner.
I’ll spend the extra money on something like a PS3 for a weekend clio but for my daily (which is much faster) I’ll settle for something mid/upper.
TL
R buy whatever you want
The likes of PS3 are probably the best money can buy in the areas that are important for most clio owners, but you might find rubber bands, and anything in between, acceptable for what you want.