Ten whole pages of testosterone.
is that right?Dream on. The SLK is slower than the M3 to 60, 100 and around the ring.
Tinny...Are you sure you're not talking about the E46 M3? Which indeed, was tinny.
is that right?
the E92/3 is the same BHP as mine, but with 100lb/ft less torque, and 300kg (cabrio) 100kg (coupe) heavier, so id suggest off the line and rolling the slk would be quicker (well i know it is, from deal world situations), the book figure for the cabrio (the fair comparison to mine) is 5.1 seconds i think, which is half a second slower, and the SLK is known to be much quicker than the 4.6 to 62 than the book figure, its closer to 4.1/2. I have pulled away from many an M3 who's tried it on.
The new new M3 is quicker than the E92 though, so it might be more of a fair match, i'll report back.
around the ring i wouldn't know, the slk is not a track weapon, i know that, but i rule the roads.
and no, I'm talking about all M3s, the AMG is a very deep sound, much nicer IMO.
cool, t**t in a very fast car.FLOL
You come across as a proper tw*t!
Ten whole pages of testosterone.
is that right?
the E92/3 is the same BHP as mine, but with 100lb/ft less torque, and 300kg (cabrio) 100kg (coupe) heavier, so id suggest off the line and rolling the slk would be quicker (well i know it is, from deal world situations), the book figure for the cabrio (the fair comparison to mine) is 5.1 seconds i think, which is half a second slower, and the SLK is known to be much quicker than the 4.6 to 62 than the book figure, its closer to 4.1/2. I have pulled away from many an M3 who's tried it on.
The new new M3 is quicker than the E92 though, so it might be more of a fair match, i'll report back.
around the ring i wouldn't know, the slk is not a track weapon, i know that, but i rule the roads.
and no, I'm talking about all M3s, the AMG is a very deep sound, much nicer IMO.
is that right?
the E92/3 is the same BHP as mine, but with 100lb/ft less torque, and 300kg (cabrio) 100kg (coupe) heavier, so id suggest off the line and rolling the slk would be quicker (well i know it is, from deal world situations), the book figure for the cabrio (the fair comparison to mine) is 5.1 seconds i think, which is half a second slower, and the SLK is known to be much quicker than the 4.6 to 62 than the book figure, its closer to 4.1/2. I have pulled away from many an M3 who's tried it on.
The new new M3 is quicker than the E92 though, so it might be more of a fair match, i'll report back.
around the ring i wouldn't know, the slk is not a track weapon, i know that, but i rule the roads.
and no, I'm talking about all M3s, the AMG is a very deep sound, much nicer IMO.
And need. Lots of need.Ten whole pages of testosterone.
cool, tw*t in a very fast car.
I love discussions about tenths of a second...it's all that matters after all.
The stench of 'faux baller' in here is nauseating.
I did lol at extra ballast! Not sure why people always have such a go at Dave, I find him funny. He plays on something that CS itself brought up, that he's baller, instead of fighting it he just plays with it. Laugh a little.
For a 1 series it is.Haha this thread is brilliant.
I'd love a 1M but 40k is a lot of money.
but i rule the roads.
There are some great lease deals about.
Forum Users dont get to comment on baller status.
Haha this thread is brilliant.
I'd love a 1M but 40k is a lot of money.
Not for cs high rollers it isn't.
Lol consider me a CS pauper then
Of course you're going to discount the cabrio, as it weakens your argument, but comparing apples for apples, mine is a convertible so I chose the m3 convertible to compare.Yes.
Only a clown would buy the E93, so lets discount the Carbrio figures all together. The E92 M3 is 30kg lighter than the SLK...Not sure where you're getting your stats from also I'm certain you're carrying extra ballast over most. And the 0-62 and 0-100 on paper is quicker on every site I could find. In the real world I doubt there is much in it, but the SLK is not a drivers focused car like the M3. (I know, I own a new SLK as well, and I like it a lot)
I also like the AMG noise. But the M3 noise is in no way tinny, watch my video on the previous page.
Now Schhhh.
I know you're fishing, and I'm going to bite, but didn't you buy (sorry rent) the slower, over 5 seconds to 62, cheaper, manual M135i?That's no quicker than my M-Lite shopping car
All show, no go iirc.
Some people just take the internet too seriously, I have a laugh, the ballast joke was quite funny, I'll give him that.I did lol at extra ballast! Not sure why people always have such a go at Dave, I find him funny. He plays on something that CS itself brought up, that he's baller, instead of fighting it he just plays with it. Laugh a little.
didn't you buy (sorry rent) the slower, over 5 seconds to 62, cheaper, manual M135i?
Oh and doesn't your engine noise have to come boosted through the stereo because it's so quiet?
Ahh, I get it now Ali, you have an E92, and the title of the exhaust vid on the other page suggests it's the oem modded, so not a standard sound?
/stilldontlikeitpersonally
I'm sure that someone once said if your AMG says 55 before it, you are doing it wrong.