This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
cant really comment cos i've never done it. but a longer lens would help, and moving away from the house/building in the background would take attention away from it. kinda looks busy with that in the background, if that makes sense.
a longer lens would help, and moving away from the house/building in the background would take attention away from it. kinda looks busy with that in the background, if that makes sense.
I disagree with that, I know you probably won't be aware but that house is a well known landmark in Manx rallying and I think including it has added to the composition - I've never seen a shot like that before, usually the cottage forms a static background for shots coming round the nearby hairpin. I might try a similar shot if I'm there in May/July
Very good for a first go, whilst a longer lens would produce more 'traditional' pans with the car filling a greater % of the frame, i quite like the distant frames, its one i will be trying this year i think. For example this shot:
(not mine, stolen from POTN: member is Matt Mead)
As has been mentioned i would maybe consider trying to get a slightly less cluttered background, i might also move the car to the bottom of the frame so you have less foreground and more background/sky. I also find cars always look better from as low as you can get. If you can see their roof they dont often look amazing. Not sure why, just something i personally try to do/not do.