There not both valver engines! The 137bhp one is the 1.8 16v F7P fitted to the 16v, and 110bhp is the 1.8 8v F3P engine fitted to the RSi.
woooo someone else who favours the rsi engine i agree more tourqy....of course im biased and never driven a valver lol....There not both valver engines! The 137bhp one is the 1.8 16v F7P fitted to the 16v, and 110bhp is the 1.8 8v F3P engine fitted to the RSi.
Bang on the money!
IMO the RSi engine is a better engine, far more torquey, on track theres f**k all in it till you get to a big straight
woooo someone else who favours the rsi engine i agree more tourqy....of course im biased and never driven a valver lol....Bang on the money!
IMO the RSi engine is a better engine, far more torquey, on track theres f**k all in it till you get to a big straight
in all honesty i love the shape of mk1s better than 1*2s and 197s...admitadly i'd perfer the wide arches to match the valver but oh well lol...woooo someone else who favours the rsi engine i agree more tourqy....of course im biased and never driven a valver lol....
Engine might be better but the car is a crap shape
(could be worse thought, you could drive a Korsar! :rasp
woooo someone else who favours the rsi engine i agree more tourqy....of course im biased and never driven a valver lol....
Engine might be better but the car is a crap shape
(could be worse thought, you could drive a Korsar! :rasp
the powers deliverys not bad threw 1st 2nd 3rd but u get to 4500-5000 in 4th and thats when u start to notice the power fading...but from 5th does goto 135 (my speeds out due to small wheel & tyre size as well so its bout 120max)id say the rsi pulss well then runs out of revs,where the valver pulls well then takes off at 4500