Im glad you linked to that, i saw the topic and immediately thought "here we go again"
People don't mind paying 500 for a yozza on a 182, but 1000 for an Akrapovic on a 200 that is three times the value is too much?
Cost of mods to a car is all relative to the value of the car in most cases, this is no different.
In five years time maybe, when the 200 has depreciated, yes maybe too expensive, but not now. IMO.
But thats just it. The Yozza and the Akra are essentially the same thing, you're just paying an extra £500 for the carbon tips. You cant seriously argue theres an extra £500 worth of piping or development PER EXHAUST thats gone into the Akra? And bare in mind they are both SS systems!
Edit: Im not saying the Akra is crap or its not worth it, im just saying using value as a means of justifying the cost doesnt work IMO.
How is it a heap? Haven't you just got it lol
you not saw my thead about 12 dealership visits, new engine, destroying tyres in 2000 miles, legal battle with arnold clark etc? lol
if its giving a flat spot im out!
renault spend all that cash giving the car 20% more torque under 3000rpm or what ever the figure was for people to change the exhaust and loose torque under 3000rpm. no thanks!
It will create a flat spot, even cutting the centre silencer out of the standard system gives you a flat spot, never mind decat and full system.
If you're having a remap, they will iron out the flat spot.