I'm not moaning people with cams have more power - I'm simply pointing out that a good set of cams with a good map produces nearly the same peak BHP as ITB's. Obviously not the same curve or power delivery - but for the money they are a good solution for people who don't want to throw £3k at ITB's
You can get 90% of the speed for 40% of the investment. And you don't have the hassle of christmas tree light dashboards and wired throttle body conversions. For most occasional track users I don't think ITB's are justifiable.
It's not bad in traffic either even with the little polo rad, it's smooth and driveable - it's just not economical.
There's nothing wrong with the fuelling or the map -
it runs a wideband and the omex has narrowband control enabled. Idle's spot on the afr it should do.
It was mapped by the same guy who maps and supports the number 1 S2000 car in BTCC at the moment so I'm sure the mapping is fine
You can't exactly expect a throttle bodied 2litre clio to be economical ticking over in traffic through town. I don't think any of us have built ITB'd clios to be economical either.