ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
Best shots ive ever taken?..
- Thread starter Guy
- Start date
my mate got as many/more photos too with near identical cameras, so i'll see what his turned out like tomorrow.
the dark two pics are humber bridge yeah.. was like no light level at all unfortunately so cars a bit dark
my mate was using a higher ISO so i think his will be a bit brighter?
others are somewhere else.. wonder if anyone guesses where.. the building is quite distinguishable as its a rather odd shape!
the dark two pics are humber bridge yeah.. was like no light level at all unfortunately so cars a bit dark
my mate was using a higher ISO so i think his will be a bit brighter?
others are somewhere else.. wonder if anyone guesses where.. the building is quite distinguishable as its a rather odd shape!
cheers all , im trying to decide which to get printed in poster size though to frame.. hmm
got decent large pics of my previous motors. (106 at french car show, and 182 round cadwell)
clart - i took my2 yr old nephew (well he took me cos it was my first time and hes been a few lol) earlier this year. its quite cool inside.
im from the otherside of the bridge, but me and my mate were over at 'the junction' in hull for a VW meet on sun night, and the regular's took us to the deep to get some photos.. http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a168/Dean05/DVW069.jpg
so we popped back in my vx lastnight to get some photos cos the location seemed well cool for piccies.
got decent large pics of my previous motors. (106 at french car show, and 182 round cadwell)
clart - i took my2 yr old nephew (well he took me cos it was my first time and hes been a few lol) earlier this year. its quite cool inside.
im from the otherside of the bridge, but me and my mate were over at 'the junction' in hull for a VW meet on sun night, and the regular's took us to the deep to get some photos.. http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a168/Dean05/DVW069.jpg
so we popped back in my vx lastnight to get some photos cos the location seemed well cool for piccies.
B
Brown.
what camera, what lens ,what ISO, what shutter speed and f stop????
Canon ixus 700 compact camera
manual mode
various settings.. some of them i was just increasing the exposure. most were doen using various long shutter speeds from 1sec-15 sec (8 to 10 seconds on them ones taken on the flat ground) 15 second at the humber bridge cos there was no light
I left it on ISO 50, ive yet to experiment with changing the ISO.. doesnt it make the pic lighter but more grainy?
manual mode
various settings.. some of them i was just increasing the exposure. most were doen using various long shutter speeds from 1sec-15 sec (8 to 10 seconds on them ones taken on the flat ground) 15 second at the humber bridge cos there was no light
I left it on ISO 50, ive yet to experiment with changing the ISO.. doesnt it make the pic lighter but more grainy?
B
Brown.
iso applies more noise thats all, personally id never go above 100, unless i was capturing moving birds say. always use low iso as at 50 there will be next to no noise, longer shuttler speeds will lighten if you left the shutter open for a minit the picture would white out.....so just keep ya tripod with ya!!!! am impressed with the quality knowing its a compact!!
the shutter speed will only go up to 15seconds on this camera mate..
i could have wound the ISO up for them really dark bridge pics a bit as i only had it left on 50.. my mates was on about 400 i think. i'll get the cd of the pics off him and see how his came out in comparison.
on the pic on flat ground i had it on iso50 and like 8 seconds, whereas my mate was gettign similar shots with iso 400 and like 4 seconds. im assuming his wont be as sharp as mine came out?
i could have wound the ISO up for them really dark bridge pics a bit as i only had it left on 50.. my mates was on about 400 i think. i'll get the cd of the pics off him and see how his came out in comparison.
on the pic on flat ground i had it on iso50 and like 8 seconds, whereas my mate was gettign similar shots with iso 400 and like 4 seconds. im assuming his wont be as sharp as mine came out?
Similar threads
