Maybe its wasnt a real type-r, as there is NOWAY that a 1.2 clio could keep up with it ever, if a 172 cant even keep up with a type-r, how could a 1.2! it must have been a rep type-r, as my mate has a 1.2 clio and its SLOW, lets be honest 172/182/ctr arent fast cars, they are nippy. And for some1 to say a 1.2 is fast i have to laugh!
Maybe its wasnt a real type-r, as there is NOWAY that a 1.2 clio could keep up with it ever, if a 172 cant even keep up with a type-r, how could a 1.2! it must have been a rep type-r, as my mate has a 1.2 clio and its SLOW, lets be honest 172/182/ctr arent fast cars, they are nippy. And for some1 to say a 1.2 is fast i have to laugh!
Great thread. I don't see any reason why you can't have as much fun in a small engined car as you can in a more powerful model.
The fun of driving a small engined car is frantically changing gears keeping the thing on the boil. You can heel and toe down changing into a corner and exit with all your revs, it's like a challenge to get the thing up to speed and keep it there and that's where the fun is.
There are racing championships for Citroen 2cv's which are pretty much set up on this principal that you don't need lot's of power to have fun.
MX5 owners will agree with me here, if you drive one of them on the limit you are rewarded, the gears snick into place so nicely you forget you've only got a little 1.6 with 115bhp.
My dad's merc is about 300bhp and all that does is pin you in the seat on straights, I'm sure the novelty wears off, so it feels a little soulless.
noisy cups in Hx??
will have to keep me eyes open next time im thrashin the williams over that way hehe