Full Fat? Advertised by K-Tec

[JD]

I think that must have just been a mistake or a miss understanding.

Theres no logical reason to call a normal 1*2 a full fat. It's just a normal 1*2.

Ok chap. Back when I joined the forum, that's how it was.

Think of milk.

 

[theduck]

First reference to full fat on the forum in terms of a clio model was 23rd December 2003 and was about the 172 ph2.

http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?74497-who-just-got-a-172&highlight=Full+fat

 

[Jack!]

First reference to full fat in terms of a model was 23rd December 2003 and was about the 172 ph2.

http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?74497-who-just-got-a-172&highlight=Full+fat

If only he was still with us to see how far we have fallen, what chaos he has created.

 

[dlee182]

And to throw a spanner into the works, I believe the term Full Fat has come from the Range Rover fraternity?

 

[Sunglasses_Ron]

And to throw a spanner into the works, I believe the term Full Fat has come from the Range Rover fraternity?

Milk surely?

 

[Scrooge]

Load of ol' b****cks.

 

[MRBILLYUK]

First reference to full fat on the forum in terms of a clio model was 23rd December 2003 and was about the 172 ph2.

http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?74497-who-just-got-a-172&highlight=Full+fat

theduck . Thank you for taking the time to clear that one up . I knew way back before the 182's arrived on the scene , when there were only 2 variants of the Ph2 172 , one being the Cup the other being a Normal 172 with all the toys it was referred to as a Full Fat , probably due to it's extra weight compared to the Cup . That's how i always thought of my 172 anyway , as a Full Fat .