Just had a thought as well. Would sticking brake calipers hinder this as well. Not that I know if they are or not but easy to check!
look what a difference Big Iains car made with afrtermarket manifold and zorst, madness!!!
Ah your sorted then if you have ramps. Half the battle
Ill buy it before you burn it. I love it.
look what a difference Big Iains car made with afrtermarket manifold and zorst, madness!!!
^^ enlighten me, what did he hit?
130?
Wasnt a good run today for you mate. Eecklesvalver ran 130+ BHP, could be a stuck valve on his as the man at Falkland said.
The exhaust would be effecting performance, just i dont know how much.
And did the dozen plus other 2 litre clios that ran the same day also over read or were you 10bhp down on all of them?
And did the dozen plus other 2 litre clios that ran the same day also over read or were you 10bhp down on all of them?
wot im meaning if mine was at least 25 bhp over then maybe its the RR thats wrong
172 ps is 166.6 hp is it not?
4hp down isnt too terrible really considering
what all the same degree of modification etc?172 ps is 166.6 hp is it not?
4hp down isnt too terrible really considering
He was 10bhp down on 172s that ran on the same RR on the same day though.
If i ran 162 bhp mate i would be happy, the engine is probably just needing a fresh going over now ive got problems i will stick up my graph soon for all to see, massive power drop between 3k-5k up then dives down at the end again:dapprove:
If i ran 162 bhp mate i would be happy, the engine is probably just needing a fresh going over now ive got problems i will stick up my graph soon for all to see, massive power drop between 3k-5k up then dives down at the end again:dapprove:
Yeah your was gutting, somthing defo not right there. I would have mines on ebay by now
Yeah your was gutting, somthing defo not right there. I would have mines on ebay by now
NA lol i have 2 years warrenty on him and will be getting it fixed for nothing as i bought the car like that from evanshalshaw first thing im getting them to do is change the back box its not even a 172 backbox:evil: then the cats getting checked then onto the engine, compresion tests etc but its something simple as the engine runs as sweet as a nut doesnt burn any fluids and doesnt over heat:S strange
decat for 100 quid? any more info on that one mate as im having bad cases of tight wallet syndrome paying ktec 120 quid for a straight bit of pipeTyre pressures are checked and adjusted as ness. Ran at 32psi on the day.
John i recon for a 100 quid the decat isnt bad. Keep the CAT in the garage and well change it at MOT time. But the decat wont remove the cheap pattern part rear box.
Darren was really happy with the quality of his exhaust on the Cup from CRD.
MIght be worth the trip up for a price on a stelth.
Get the plugs done . Cheap to do and will rule that out.
decat for 100 quid? any more info on that one mate as im having bad cases of tight wallet syndrome paying ktec 120 quid for a straight bit of pipeTyre pressures are checked and adjusted as ness. Ran at 32psi on the day.
John i recon for a 100 quid the decat isnt bad. Keep the CAT in the garage and well change it at MOT time. But the decat wont remove the cheap pattern part rear box.
Darren was really happy with the quality of his exhaust on the Cup from CRD.
MIght be worth the trip up for a price on a stelth.
Get the plugs done . Cheap to do and will rule that out.
for a ph2 btw
quick question mate which no ones asked,what does she drive/perform like?
reason im asking is i realise your a bit down that you didnt match others figures,but to be fair mate stuff what a rolling road says,if it goes well and you still like driving her as much as you did before this rolling road then id still be happy
172 ps is 166.6 hp is it not?
4hp down isnt too terrible really considering
I remain unconvinced! Btw it was 123.8bhp at the wheels, how does that compare?
Yeah your was gutting, somthing defo not right there. I would have mines on ebay by now
NA lol i have 2 years warrenty on him and will be getting it fixed for nothing as i bought the car like that from evanshalshaw first thing im getting them to do is change the back box its not even a 172 backbox:evil: then the cats getting checked then onto the engine, compresion tests etc but its something simple as the engine runs as sweet as a nut doesnt burn any fluids and doesnt over heat:S strange
If i ran 162 bhp mate i would be happy, the engine is probably just needing a fresh going over now ive got problems i will stick up my graph soon for all to see, massive power drop between 3k-5k up then dives down at the end again:dapprove:
decat for 100 quid? any more info on that one mate as im having bad cases of tight wallet syndrome paying ktec 120 quid for a straight bit of pipe
for a ph2 btw
http://www.k-tecracing.com/show_product.asp?id=2034
Just over the Ton but worth it
If i ran 162 bhp mate i would be happy, the engine is probably just needing a fresh going over now ive got problems i will stick up my graph soon for all to see, massive power drop between 3k-5k up then dives down at the end again:dapprove:
I thought thats where your power would come in and increae on your power graph ?
With the system the Rs has thats similar to VVti :S
Could it be a sensor attached related to your VVti (or 5k kick as its called) that is causing the problems ?
Bet that decat is a pain in the arse to fit ?
With one flange so far up the back of engine
I remain unconvinced! Btw it was 123.8bhp at the wheels, how does that compare?
123.8 bhp at the wheels does NOT correspond to 162 bhp at the flywheel.
That's way to high an amount of power (23.6%) to be lost in the drivetrain in a transverse front wheel drive car. The right number is about 15%, or even lower. What that says is that there's serious questions about that dyno and/or its operator. You can't rely on the numbers he's giving you.
However that doesn't answer the question of why your car produced less power than other cars tested on the day that it shouldn't have produced less power than. People can suggest possible reasons, but without evidence of which of the great many of them it could be, you and we have no idea. All they suggest is what it might be worth you investigating first.
Looking at the dyno chart you posted your car looks like it would feel strong in normal road driving. It has a lot of torque at low revs. Rather than your car having a fault that's subtracting power, it looks more like its tuned for torque rather than power. That points the finger at something like cam timing. Was the cam belt put on one tooth out, or somehow incorrectly? Is the VVT fully advancing?
Just had a thought as well. Would sticking brake calipers hinder this as well. Not that I know if they are or not but easy to check!
NA lol i have 2 years warrenty on him and will be getting it fixed for nothing as i bought the car like that from evanshalshaw first thing im getting them to do is change the back box its not even a 172 backbox:evil: then the cats getting checked then onto the engine, compresion tests etc but its something simple as the engine runs as sweet as a nut doesnt burn any fluids and doesnt over heat:S strange
Has your backbox got a join on it mate where it meets the centre section ?
Meaning does the backbox slide together onto the centre exhaust section and clamp with an exhaust clamp ?
Cos if it does have a clamp its been replaced at somepoint.
Reason i'm asking is the exhausts standard are all one piece from the cat back from the ranault factory and the pipe from the backbox from centre section needs cut to remove backbox.
And would fitting the wrong backbox from the same age of clio (eg. 1.2, 1.4 etc) really affect power figures ? :S
Yeah it sounded as if it was sort of being held back so to speak..
It just didn't sound right compared with other 172/182's that were running, there was a sort of grinding noise as if the car was struggling.
Are you having it checked over at the dealer?
Has your backbox got a join on it mate where it meets the centre section ?
Meaning does the backbox slide together onto the centre exhaust section and clamp with an exhaust clamp ?
Cos if it does have a clamp its been replaced at somepoint.
Reason i'm asking is the exhausts standard are all one piece from the cat back from the ranault factory and the pipe from the backbox from centre section needs cut to remove backbox.
It just didn't sound right compared with other 172/182's that were running, there was a sort of grinding noise as if the car was struggling.
Are you having it checked over at the dealer?
It just didn't sound right compared with other 172/182's that were running, there was a sort of grinding noise as if the car was struggling.
Are you having it checked over at the dealer?
I would agree with this
get the plugs out and find someone with an endoscope that can have a look inside the engine
or remove the inlet manifold and turn the engine by hand to check to see if the inlet valves are opening
i know of 1 mk1 172 that made 150bhp, problem was a knackered lambda
and i also know of another that was a 15V from new! that made around 135bhp and would not rev past about 6500rpm, didn't hit the limiter, just stopped reving