The fanboy thing annoys me a little, always involves Apple and is usually a sure sign of someone losing an argument on here.
My mate's wife called me an 'Apple geek' the other day, purely because I ordered some new stuff.
Like her, it's usually said by those that can't afford it.
Do apple actually sell anything that people are likely to be unable to afford? I mean unless we are talking unemployed or minimum wage people etc.
Even their high end laptops are only a couple of grand arent they?
Harsh words.
How is that harsh?
Implying if you can't afford an Apple product, you're unemployed or on minimum wage.
Apple products aren't a priority of mine.
Not meaning to sound like a tit, but if I didn't have a mortgage and lived at home like many, I could afford a Ferrari, so could many.
But I do see where you are coming from.
My mate's wife called me an 'Apple geek' the other day, purely because I ordered some new stuff.
Like her, it's usually said by those that can't afford it.
Good job on fuelling the w*nky 'Apple Elitist' fire.
Forget that, either in the post on launch day, or 2 weeks after launch day in the shop/post. Forget queueing for it!
If a 172 was the best, most expensive car on the market, then yes. That analogy would work.
Lol @ that, I guess I should have said a toblerone or whatever then by your logic as thats the dearest chocolate bar.
500 quid iphone is expensive for a phone, but still a very accessable amount of money to all but the very poorest surely?
Sorry but anyone trying to express wealth with something so cheap is on a bit of a hiding to nothing IMHO, unless we are talking schoolkids.
Is this not an utterly obvious and a pointless argument?
Depends on your frame of reference and priorities, surely? Sure, some people can't afford it, however some people actually just want to make calls and have 90% of the experience and buy WP7/ Android.
Is this not an utterly obvious and a pointless argument?
I wanted one of those little flip phones about 10 years ago because that guy from Spandau Ballet who was in Eastenders had one and I thought he looked cool
Flol, Im too old I guess, no such thing as a cool mobile phone really when I was a kid, the ones that did exist were purely for business use and were massively expensive and were all ridiculous looking,so no one brand really stood out from any other.
I do once remember a 16 year old girl saying to me "wow cool you have a matrix phone" when I pulled it out to take her number down which made me wonder a bit about how anyone could be impressed by something so trivial, mind you I was impressed by her tits and to others that probably seems trivial too.
You don't realise nice things impress people?
Indeed it is, hence I wasnt getting involved at all in that core argument, I couldnt care less what make phone others have etc.
Although I do find it genuinely interesting that others might have low enough self esteem to feel a phone could help bolster it etc or to envy others for their phone or tablet pc etc.
By referencing the cost of an item, you tackled the "core argument" head on.
For someone that has such little interest in the subject, you seem pretty keen on questioning the semantics and reasoning behind why any individual would make certain purchase decisions? Surely you'd have to have more than a passing interest, in order to keep re-visiting such a nebulous subject? Aren't there a myriad reasons? I'd wager that self-esteem and having a mis-guided superiority complex *might* be an issue for a fraction of the user-base but how about "it's an easy-to-use device" or "It's plainly better, in my view"?
Because something isn't what you would choose to own, makes it reprehensible in some way, right?
but by waiting to buy the 5 your buying new technology...