nice one Ben j .. it seems its only you that wants to sl*g the CRX you may thin the CRX is ugly looking, but at least its different, the clio is just the same as any other supermini being produced these days, they all look similar, no originality.
as for slow,well cliojohn(malky) anytime you fancy a drag up the dual carrigeway just let me know....ill even give you a head start and you can tell the rest of these people how slow it is, and as for you again Ben j you cant seriously believe that your 16v would beat a CRX ..can you.. just think for a second..... ok , now go stand in the corner and shush
again on Ben js point "lets all sl*g CRXs for being poo!"
ok.. let me see.. my car is an F reg, thats 1989 if i remember right, which is near enough 14 years old, and whats gone wrong with it? absolutely nothing,runs fine,and works perfect...but when we look at the clio, i know a certain man who bought himself a brand new dynamique and within the first two days of having it was telling me that it had broken down, is this not true Cliojohn?
sure they may have fixed that and it may be forgiveable , but the service lights after 3k miles... the window rubbers popping after one month... i cant remember what else has gone wrong with it, but im sure thats not it all...
this aint really a dig at you malky by the way, just letting this guy know the score.
im done for now....
i await your replies