I can't say I've ever seen many chavs driving them, most chavs would struggle to afford one for a start as they seem to hold their value well.
ST's a lot of criticism on here because theyre slower than a 172/182, big deal. They're a good overall package, nice example there too (though I think the stickers make it look a bit cluttered). I bet you'll miss it.
It's sat on my drive mate Will get some pics up this weekend, just not had a chance. I'm over the moon with it tho! :evil:Where is the new car mate...???
Was on KW/Weitec coilovers.What suspension was it on?
Yeah I couldn't knock it for it's build quality - light years better than my clio. No rattles! The ST didn't rust either, despite rumours that the model was particularly bad with rust.+1
You find the people that slate them jump on the band wagon of people that have never even sat in one never mind drove one.
My bro used to have one, sublime cars tbh, far better built than any Renault.
His had a full miltek and cosworth cams, tbf it was as quick as my 172
Ford engines are very tuneable, look at the 1.6 zetec se engine good for 200bhp!! ST's are good cars, sure ive seen that on zsoc sometime?!