Only thing I'm not a fan of is the graphic on the side, otherwise it looks great!
Whut? No Cup Pack?!
Looks ace though, but I still don't understand them without the Cup Pack.
More gentleman spec
Cupped 200's have a quicker steering rack, and uprated springs/dampers as per. A standard 200 has a 197 rack, and even softer set up. The standard 197 is good chassis wise, so its no biggie
The setup on the standard 200 is better to drive than the 200. It may be softer, but Kw's/billies/H&r's are softer than Ast's .
Why?You must live near some very bumpy roads?!!
Just read what I put, meant to say better than the 197!The setup on the standard 200 is better to drive than the 200. It may be softer, but Kw's/billies/H&r's are softer than Ast's .
Why?
Drive one fella. I'm not the only one that feels the same way, the press reception matches mine. And it doesn't just have softer springs, dampers too I believe. The 197 is better looking, and cheaper. If there was bugger all difference, I would of gone for the 197! But the 197 just doesn't gel for me, zero enjoyment when I've driven them.Hmmmm. Think the standard 200 was meant as more of a GT spec, as thats how the French like them, softer sprung etc. Granted i've never driven a standard 200, but with the same chassis bar softer springs on a 200 i cant see how it drives better than a 197, bar the slightly better low down grunt of the engine?
No, the guy was trying it on. Found it was a non-cup rack he was selling as a cup rack.The roads round me arnt exactly smooth, but my r27 was still composed and not skittish at all when 'progressing' at pace. I now have v3's and still no problem. Ive been a passenger in a non cupped 200 and felt a bit spongy imo. Cup pack gives it the edge for me. Did you ever get the faster rack put in yours?