It went off topic, like the moderator said.
Here is a chance to continue the conversation, about modern technology versus old character, or whatever fans of old cars think they do best.
But then, when some lad in a 1.2 Nova beats it down the twisties, theyll think theyve beaten a proper Williams.Quote: Originally posted by James on 16 July 2004
What Renault need to do is put some Williams badges on a 182. Old but new, all sorted.
Quote: Origin~~~y posted by u33db on 16 July 2004
I think this should be banned TBH - after 10 pages on the last topic of people missing the point its unlikely to get resolved now....
Lets face it some people like having a decent quick and safe brand new car thats suppossed to be top of the pile while some of us like paying less than half of yours for a slightly older car, with more character that does the job just as good.
Big deal m8!
Some of you can only afford half and i think thats why people get so defensive,because you paid half doesnt mean it has twice as much character..Im not pointing that at anyone in particular but lets face it if money was no object then 99% of us wouldnt even be on this forum.Some older cars like the willy can have lots of charm but thats it,charm and nostalgia can only take you so far........The williams has bucket loads of this and that along with the budget is what people hold on to.And lets not forget they are not bullet proof.If there was a huge divide between the reliability of a willy to a 182/cup then the aurgument would be over.People will reply that they own a willy and nothing has gone wrong,i too can say my 02 172 has never broken once either,as i said before they are both cut from the same cloth...~~~ that went into the williams was resourced for the 172/cup and 182...They didnt just throw away the mold.The succes the williams had was astonishing when it came out and it re-wrote the books as we have ~~~ read but now they are saying the same with the 182...Phill bennett holds the nurbergring record for a production car and knows his stuff,hes been racing for years now and says the 182 is the finest FWD car he has ever driven...That must mean something.......Just because weve spent more money than you doesnt mean weve got more to proove...Its just that things do move on...The clio williams tested in evo 2 yrs ago had 25k on the clock so when the 172 outbraked it and pulled more G in a corner i think this was a fair example of two evenly matched cars with similar miles.....
Both great cars but progress is progress however much anything costs or however new cars are......The williams is still great though
Regards,ian
ok thats fair enough, but the point i was trying to make was over that fact certain ppl thought that becuase a peice of paper says ur car is slightly faster then a willaims/16v makes it a better car, i have no problems with the 172/182 at all i do like them, after all im a clio owner lol !Quote: Originally posted by ian 172 on 16 July 2004
Quote: Origin~~~y posted by u33db on 16 July 2004
I think this should be banned TBH - after 10 pages on the last topic of people missing the point its unlikely to get resolved now....
Lets face it some people like having a decent quick and safe brand new car thats suppossed to be top of the pile while some of us like paying less than half of yours for a slightly older car, with more character that does the job just as good.
Big deal m8!
Some of you can only afford half and i think thats why people get so defensive,because you paid half doesnt mean it has twice as much character..Im not pointing that at anyone in particular but lets face it if money was no object then 99% of us wouldnt even be on this forum.Some older cars like the willy can have lots of charm but thats it,charm and nostalgia can only take you so far........The williams has bucket loads of this and that along with the budget is what people hold on to.And lets not forget they are not bullet proof.If there was a huge divide between the reliability of a willy to a 182/cup then the aurgument would be over.People will reply that they own a willy and nothing has gone wrong,i too can say my 02 172 has never broken once either,as i said before they are both cut from the same cloth...~~~ that went into the williams was resourced for the 172/cup and 182...They didnt just throw away the mold.The succes the williams had was astonishing when it came out and it re-wrote the books as we have ~~~ read but now they are saying the same with the 182...Phill bennett holds the nurbergring record for a production car and knows his stuff,hes been racing for years now and says the 182 is the finest FWD car he has ever driven...That must mean something.......Just because weve spent more money than you doesnt mean weve got more to proove...Its just that things do move on...The clio williams tested in evo 2 yrs ago had 25k on the clock so when the 172 outbraked it and pulled more G in a corner i think this was a fair example of two evenly matched cars with similar miles.....
Both great cars but progress is progress however much anything costs or however new cars are......The williams is still great though
Regards,ian
Anybody who wouldnt is kidding themselves.Quote: Originally posted by Daz on 16 July 2004
To be honest.. and this is only my opinion, so dont jump on me.. heh.
If I had the choice of two cars, 182 or Williams.. and I could afford either, Id have a 182.
Quote: Originally posted by 182 sport on 16 July 2004
Anybody who wouldnt is kidding themselves.Quote: Originally posted by Daz on 16 July 2004
To be honest.. and this is only my opinion, so dont jump on me.. heh.
If I had the choice of two cars, 182 or Williams.. and I could afford either, Id have a 182.
not mr nobjockey again!!!!^^^^^^^^^^^
Not really, given the choice Id have a Williams every time. Id even have a normal 16v over a new Clio. Im not a fan of many new cars, the Clio is disgusting and next years model (if it looks like the pictures) is an abomination! 205, Mk1 Clio, Mk3 Escort, now those are nice looking cars! In my opinion of courseQuote: Originally posted by 182 sport on 16 July 2004
Anybody who wouldnt is kidding themselves.Quote: Originally posted by Daz on 16 July 2004
To be honest.. and this is only my opinion, so dont jump on me.. heh.
If I had the choice of two cars, 182 or Williams.. and I could afford either, Id have a 182.
i would honestly choose the williams over 182 , id be half tempted if it was the cup, but not 182Quote: Originally posted by 182 sport on 16 July 2004
Anybody who wouldnt is kidding themselves.Quote: Originally posted by Daz on 16 July 2004
To be honest.. and this is only my opinion, so dont jump on me.. heh.
If I had the choice of two cars, 182 or Williams.. and I could afford either, Id have a 182.
but then you drive a 1.4 rt clio mk1Quote: Originally posted by number2301 on 16 July 2004
Not really, given the choice Id have a Williams every time. Id even have a normal 16v over a new Clio. Im not a fan of many new cars, the Clio is disgusting and next years model (if it looks like the pictures) is an abomination! 205, Mk1 Clio, Mk3 Escort, now those are nice looking cars! In my opinion of courseQuote: Originally posted by 182 sport on 16 July 2004
Anybody who wouldnt is kidding themselves.Quote: Originally posted by Daz on 16 July 2004
To be honest.. and this is only my opinion, so dont jump on me.. heh.
If I had the choice of two cars, 182 or Williams.. and I could afford either, Id have a 182.
But then I really like the new MGs, the Fiesta before the latest one on the Focus.
Not everyone wants a new car!
Quote: Originally posted by 182 sport on 16 July 2004
but then you drive a 1.4 rt clio mk1
come back when your a member ya tight ass git!!!! its only a fiver! and you say ya drive a 172?????
Id have the 182 as well I dont mind saying that.Quote: Originally posted by Daz on 16 July 2004
To be honest.. and this is only my opinion, so dont jump on me.. heh.
If I had the choice of two cars, 182 or Williams.. and I could afford either, Id have a 182.
Can renault simply increase the hp and uprate suspension though? The suspension on my cup is a stiff as a board, i understand its even stiffer on a 182 and if it was to be even stiffer on the 192 then surely the ride would be too crashy.Quote: Originally posted by Clio V6 2004 on 16 July 2004
2005 Clio 190.
Think how much worse it will be than the current one, with more power and torque, uprated and better suspension and a more radical look, courtesy of styling mods. to bring it right up to date and competitive with the competition.
Sounds awful.
[Edited by Clio V6 2004 on 16 July 2004 at 2:55pm]