M matlow Sep 16, 2004 #1 http://www.letstorquebhp.com/http://www.letstorquebhp.com/ tops tool for working out performance gains, seems to be pretty accurate but wouldnt mind seeing how everyone else fairs
http://www.letstorquebhp.com/http://www.letstorquebhp.com/ tops tool for working out performance gains, seems to be pretty accurate but wouldnt mind seeing how everyone else fairs
S SOHROB Car Snotter's Sep 16, 2004 #2 wot do u think to the performance figures ? are they fairly accurate
S Snufty Car 172 Exclusive Sep 16, 2004 #3 They seemed quite accurate for mine to be honest when i put roughly what i believe mine to be
R RS-Steve Car Ford F-150 5.4 V8 Sep 16, 2004 #4 Good site. You/they have the Focus RS as 230bhp. There are some that high std but most were 212-225bhp out the factory. But yeah pretty accurate for all the cars i know.
Good site. You/they have the Focus RS as 230bhp. There are some that high std but most were 212-225bhp out the factory. But yeah pretty accurate for all the cars i know.
V viceroy Car 2005 Audi A3 3.2 Quattro Sep 17, 2004 #6 0-60 is rather hopeful but 0-100 seems about spot on
black kro Car Meg on pistonheads £6995 Sep 17, 2004 #7 BRILLIANT - even works for Diesels! 0-60 are within a fraction of a second! 85BHP standard = 11.66 (11.6 tested in diesel car) 100BHP chipped = 10.01 (10.5 is official 100BHP figure)
BRILLIANT - even works for Diesels! 0-60 are within a fraction of a second! 85BHP standard = 11.66 (11.6 tested in diesel car) 100BHP chipped = 10.01 (10.5 is official 100BHP figure)
black kro Car Meg on pistonheads £6995 Sep 17, 2004 #8 ^^ slow yes, but midrange grunt is where its at!
Swervin_Mervin Car The Jinx Sep 17, 2004 #9 Their weights seem to be a little out. How can the 93 16v be 59kilos heavier than a Willy 1? Also its only 40 off being as heavy as a fully loaded 182. Dont believe that.
Their weights seem to be a little out. How can the 93 16v be 59kilos heavier than a Willy 1? Also its only 40 off being as heavy as a fully loaded 182. Dont believe that.