No Im just saying that the theory on those sites is flawed.Quote: Originally posted by Rorrie on 02 December 2004
and going by your last post you have dropped the idea that a cap would be benifitial
I do know what Im talking about, what I clearly said was the theory used on that site is flawed as a batcap would suffer the same effects.Quote: Originally posted by ^adam^ on 02 December 2004
batcaps are the way forward, im thinking of getting one for my car, pete, you really dont know what you are talking about do you?
have you ever seen a batcap in action? they are really impressive, im with rorrie on this one, power caps are a waste of time.
not one of the best systems I know of have a power cap,
Pete is correct. Some of the theory is a bit ropey.Quote: Originally posted by Rorrie on 02 December 2004
^ yep senconded,
but pete please state where the theory is flawed? coundt find it?
also the main similarity of a cap and a batcap is the charge/dischage, as they batcap (400) is 200 times larger in capacity than the average cap, it is unlikely that is will be dischaged compleatly (unless burping, or not sufficently large enough batcap for the system), for this reason it is not effected in the same way, as if it partly discharges (lets say a big bass note), but then still comes under stress, it can still be draw from, so it will not be driverting power from the amp (like a cap would be at this point) but contiune to give out until it can recharge