ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Put In My Place



  Clio Dynamique 1.6 16v
Had my 1.6 clio about 6 monthsish now, and when I first got it being 18 none of my mates bar a couple with zetec s and vtr had a car with any poke in it so was feeling pretty damn good!

Anyways, my mates just picked up one of those 2.4 litre 20 valve fiat stilos! God Damn heared powerful things about those cars.......no comparison to mine what so ever.......like i said put in my place!
 

brisa4984

ClioSport Club Member
ClarkyClio said:
Had my 1.6 clio about 6 monthsish now, and when I first got it being 18 none of my mates bar a couple with zetec s and vtr had a car with any poke in it so was feeling pretty damn good!

Anyways, my mates just picked up one of those 2.4 litre 20 valve fiat stilos! God Damn heared powerful things about those cars.......no comparison to mine what so ever.......like i said put in my place!

I reckon they all chipped in to shut you up :clown: :rasp:
 
  Clio Dynamique 1.6 16v
yea lol doubt it, they look like big weighty cars not nimble, but who knows guess il find out when he takes me 4 a drive.:star:
 
  ST
I owned a stilo arbath not so long ago they are heavy italian rubbish....worse built than a bloody clio!!
 
They are only 134bhp per tonne, but 221nm of torque and weigh 1264kg kerb weight, they would have been better getting a 172/182 ;)


Simon
 
  cock mobile.
When I had my Punto I so wanted one of these, but they are such a let down.

Abarth!!?! God that brand has so died :(

Is it an auto, most of them are, which again was a negative for me.

Love the claw alloys on them though, they are a must if he has one.
 
  Clio Dynamique 1.6 16v
Im not sure, I read online it hits sixty in 8.5, and tops out at 134, thought it would be far quicker than that on paper? Its got a padel shift gear box. semi auto i think.
 

Ad

  MK2 FRS
Alan said:
I owned a stilo arbath not so long ago they are heavy italian rubbish....worse built than a bloody clio!!

bloody hell mate... wouldnt have guessed that. Yellow one???
 
  cock mobile.
ClarkyClio said:
So the big question then, is the stilo quicker than the 172 or 182?

Not a chance mate, that's why I didn't get one, it's no where near as quick.
 
  Clio 172mk2
Engine Size: 2446 cc
Cylinders: 5
0-60 mph: 8.6 s
Power Output: 170 bhp
Valves: 20
Torque: 221 Nm
Top Speed: 132 mph


i`ll give it a miss
a clio 172 is
Engine Size: 1998 cc
Cylinders: 4
0-60 mph: 7.0 s / 6.7 Cup
Power Output: 172 bhp
Valves: 16
Torque: 200 Nm
Top Speed: 138 mph
 
  RB 200 Cup!
those stilos are absolute w**k - even with a 2.4 litre engine cant get f**k all acceleration - anyone buying one is outta their minds.

And as a side thought clio dynamiques rock! lol
 
  Clio Dynamique 1.6 16v
Timmay
And as a side thought clio dynamiques rock! lol
LOL yea!!

8.6 from a 170bhp car thats not as quick as I thought it would be, infact its slower than some 1.6s off the mark, i.e. vts, lupo gti etc... Strange. I imagie it will be quick though the higher gears tho?
 
  RB 200 Cup!
well it all boils down to it being a crappy fiat or as i like to call em Fix It Again Tony!

170bhp from 2.4 lump = w**k

clio sport = 182bhp = sex wee
 
  Fiesta ST Stage 3
That is a bit s*it from a 2.4 engine . My 200 BRM makes 148 BHP and 7.5 to 60 and its only a 1.8 ???
 


Top