Is it not a khan monstrosity??
Looks pretty decent although a bit footballer.
Would never have a Range rover after both RRS's my parents have had have gone massively wrong.
Not got a thing on any of the German rivals other than the looks department.
You are corrected, got all the gash horrid bits inside!!If it is I stand corrected
Never knew they did one to be honest!Speaking of which, saw an X5M today, stunning and 510bhp! Very understated, just 4 exhausts and small vents in the wing to say its a bit different, oh, and 325 width tyres!!
I saw one very similar to that near warrington the other week.
I really like them!! Not sure I could own one though, they are a bit too bling for me.
They're nice cars, but with the sports imo its not a proper range rover, might as well get an evoque.
Never knew they did one to be honest!
Parents have just bought the 3.0 diesel one, Handles ridiculously good for such a big car and the build quality is 10x any land rover / range rover.
I'm off to search for the X5M!
Just thrown up thinking of the evoque. Range rover should never have put its name to such a monstrosity. It should've been a land rover but they badge snobbery would hinder sales as a L/R.
New R/R is said to budge the 100k mark, up in Bentley territory, hoping to leave X5s/Tourags/Q5s in a lower class than itself. Still looks bit blingy.
I love the earlier sports, without all the chrome and bling all over it, but favourite range rover has always been the P38 model, a 4.6 HSE is such a bruiser!!!