RDH
ClioSport Club Member
Right, well I've had the car a week today and I've finally got round to giving it a good clean and some pictures. At the moment I'm absolutely loving it, and in this thread I thought I'd also do a comparison with the 182 (which I really miss!). I'll also use it as a blog and update as I go along.
First up I'll have one last picture ***** of the 182. Was devastated when the guy drove it away, but it was time to move on. Epic car and I'll no doubt be back in one at some point. I use the following picture alot, but I don't care. It looks f*cking epic.
7 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
And now onto the R56. When I knew I was selling the Clio, I had my heart set on a R32. Looked at quite a few and I was on the way to put a deposit down on a fully specced up Recaro'd DBP MK5, when the guy rung and said he'd just sold it. So the search was back on. But after many nights of the other half nagging etc etc, we both decided it would be best to get something cheaper so we could purchase a house sooner. So the R32's went straight out of the window. I was looking round on loads of forums, Z4s/TTs/225s, when I stumbled on this for sale over on MT. A fairly respected member over there was selling up, and after many emails and texts, I gave a deposit and travelled the 230 miles to pick it up!
R56 1 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 2 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 3 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 5 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 6 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 7 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 010 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 8 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
What it needs:
Based on first impressions I love it. A much more sorted car than my old R53 was. Quicker, better built, more economical. Just an all round better car. Seeing as this a Clio forum though, more people will be interested to see how I feel when I compare it to the 182. So here goes..
Performance.
It's difficult to compare because the Mini is so much more refined than the 182, the sensation of speed is less and it basically doesn't feel like you are going as fast. If I had to choose I would say that the 182 is marginally quicker, but in some situations such as motorway cruising or around town, the Mini is 100% quicker due to the turbo. It's such a lazy engine in terms of you can pile speed on pretty quickly, without even noticing. Where as with the 182 to get anywhere you need to screw it's b*lls off to gain pace. Two very different cars in that respect. And I'd say the 182 has a more 'fun' engine and is alot more suited to being thrashed. IMO though the R56 has the best day to day engine, as the torque makes progress so much easier.
Handling.
The 182 'handled' better. Simple. The R56 has alot more grip that the 182 did (probably due to the 18s) but as an overall experience the 182 was much more fun to drive. Not to say the Mini is boring, but again due to the refinement it just feels like a solid car. It will no doubt go round corners as fast as my 182 would, but I had much more fun in the 182. I miss the twitchyness on the edge, which was much easier to find in the Clio.
Interior/Build Quality.
The R56 blows the Clio into last week. Anyone who says the build quality on a Mini is crap is insane. Spec on mine is as follows:
Most people won't be interested, but thought I'd share my thoughts as the Mini is very much a marmite car on here. I still miss the 182, and I wish their was some way I could of kept it but 3 cars and a Van was just too much.
For a b*lls out drive, the Clio wins hands down. But as a daily the R56 beats it every department bar boot space.
After the first week with the new car though, I'm very happy I decided to go back to a Mini
First up I'll have one last picture ***** of the 182. Was devastated when the guy drove it away, but it was time to move on. Epic car and I'll no doubt be back in one at some point. I use the following picture alot, but I don't care. It looks f*cking epic.
7 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
And now onto the R56. When I knew I was selling the Clio, I had my heart set on a R32. Looked at quite a few and I was on the way to put a deposit down on a fully specced up Recaro'd DBP MK5, when the guy rung and said he'd just sold it. So the search was back on. But after many nights of the other half nagging etc etc, we both decided it would be best to get something cheaper so we could purchase a house sooner. So the R32's went straight out of the window. I was looking round on loads of forums, Z4s/TTs/225s, when I stumbled on this for sale over on MT. A fairly respected member over there was selling up, and after many emails and texts, I gave a deposit and travelled the 230 miles to pick it up!
R56 1 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 2 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 3 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 5 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 6 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 7 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 010 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
R56 8 by Arctic_182, on Flickr
What it needs:
- Lowering. The current arch gap is beyond rediculous. (Although I'm loving having something that isn't stupidly low)
- New plates
- New front side lights as the yellow looks sh*t against the Xenons.
- A good machine polish which it'll be getting after winter.
Based on first impressions I love it. A much more sorted car than my old R53 was. Quicker, better built, more economical. Just an all round better car. Seeing as this a Clio forum though, more people will be interested to see how I feel when I compare it to the 182. So here goes..
Performance.
It's difficult to compare because the Mini is so much more refined than the 182, the sensation of speed is less and it basically doesn't feel like you are going as fast. If I had to choose I would say that the 182 is marginally quicker, but in some situations such as motorway cruising or around town, the Mini is 100% quicker due to the turbo. It's such a lazy engine in terms of you can pile speed on pretty quickly, without even noticing. Where as with the 182 to get anywhere you need to screw it's b*lls off to gain pace. Two very different cars in that respect. And I'd say the 182 has a more 'fun' engine and is alot more suited to being thrashed. IMO though the R56 has the best day to day engine, as the torque makes progress so much easier.
Handling.
The 182 'handled' better. Simple. The R56 has alot more grip that the 182 did (probably due to the 18s) but as an overall experience the 182 was much more fun to drive. Not to say the Mini is boring, but again due to the refinement it just feels like a solid car. It will no doubt go round corners as fast as my 182 would, but I had much more fun in the 182. I miss the twitchyness on the edge, which was much easier to find in the Clio.
Interior/Build Quality.
The R56 blows the Clio into last week. Anyone who says the build quality on a Mini is crap is insane. Spec on mine is as follows:
- Piano Black interior upgrade
- Upgraded HiFi (Better speakers, better HU, tweeters in the A pillars and an amp built into the boot. It may have more speakers as well but I'm not sure)
- MFSW
- Cruise
- Mood Lighting
Most people won't be interested, but thought I'd share my thoughts as the Mini is very much a marmite car on here. I still miss the 182, and I wish their was some way I could of kept it but 3 cars and a Van was just too much.
For a b*lls out drive, the Clio wins hands down. But as a daily the R56 beats it every department bar boot space.
After the first week with the new car though, I'm very happy I decided to go back to a Mini