RR Results

[lasbazrre]

http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w16/lasbazrre/scan6.jpg

http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w16/lasbazrre/scan5.jpg

Been on the the RS Tuning EGO BUSTER today!

As you can see the cars a touch down on power , but the torque is well up!

The car pulls very nicely indeed!

Thanks to Paul and BenR

leon

 

[Russ_16v]

nice going mate!

 

[springer]

What mods you got?

 

[lasbazrre]

Inlets, itg panel, remap.

I want too keep the car standerd-ish

leon

 

[ChrisR]

That's not bad power for those mods really, wouldn't say it was down particularly.

170 (or just below) as standard, so 7 or so bhp increase

 

[lasbazrre]

It's the torque increase i like best, we had it up to 160ft lb .

The car pulls like a train! ;o)

leon

 

[Gaz_]

Should have pumped up your tyres a bit

Not bad. I need to get my 182 up against my old cup, i think i'd get beaten

 

[lasbazrre]

Should have pumped up your tyres a bit

Not bad. I need to get my 182 up against my old cup, i think i'd get beaten

I'll cheat next time

It's not known as the ego buster for nothing, 183bhp is the most a Clio has had on the roller's without majer work ( cam's , itb's, ect )

So i'm quite happy, i don't know how Renault get away with it tho? ( car's not making what it say's on the tin )

leon

 

[lasbazrre]

Anymore view's on these results?

 

[Leeshez]

Looks impressive

 

[Ali]

lol! 176 is crap mate...I'd seriously be annoyed with that! Did you have it done as std?

To put it into perspective my old 172 with simlar mods, (Maxogen and zorst/decat) Ran 192.6 with Ben and paul's handywork...

Of course it could be the road...

 

[Ali]

That's not bad power for those mods really, wouldn't say it was down particularly.

170 (or just below) as standard, so 7 or so bhp increase

Chris, he's got a 182 mate not a 172...Never seen a 182 run less than 177 as std. On 3 diff RR's i've been to.

 

[ChrisR]

That's not bad power for those mods really, wouldn't say it was down particularly.

170 (or just below) as standard, so 7 or so bhp increase

Chris, he's got a 182 mate not a 172...Never seen a 182 run less than 177 as std. On 3 diff RR's i've been to.

Oops, that'll learn me

Powerstation reckoned I had 180 oddbhp the first time I went there, I doubt that very much! Although the second time I hit 179 so I'm hoping it's a little above standard.

 

[Matt@Stealthsport]

If the RR's accurate a 182 should be 165 bhp as standard.

My car's now running 183 with a Ben R inlet, KTEC remap, Pipercross open filer and Janspeed exhaust and sportscat.

 

[lasbazrre]

lol! 176 is crap mate...I'd seriously be annoyed with that! Did you have it done as std?

To put it into perspective my old 172 with simlar mods, (Maxogen and zorst/decat) Ran 192.6 with Ben and paul's handywork...

Of course it could be the road...

I never had it RR as std mate.

As said above , Paul's rollers are not known for big gain figures, but i'd rather have the truth than some silly inflated figures

leon

 

[Ian_182]

Good results mate,you could throw another 500 quid at that and probably get 10bhp.Subtle mods are the way to go unless you have a turbo

ian

 

[lasbazrre]

If the RR's accurate a 182 should be 165 bhp as standard.

My car's now running 183 with a Ben R inlet, KTEC remap, Pipercross open filer and Janspeed exhaust and sportscat.

Well if that's the case mate , mine seems about right?

A gain of 11-12bhp , and 12-13lb ft of torque!

There does seem to be some confusion on what a std car should be?

If 165bhp is std then Renault need too sorrt it out coz there taking us for a ride with these low figures!

leon

 

[Ali]

lol! 176 is crap mate...I'd seriously be annoyed with that! Did you have it done as std?

To put it into perspective my old 172 with simlar mods, (Maxogen and zorst/decat) Ran 192.6 with Ben and paul's handywork...

Of course it could be the road...

I never had it RR as std mate.

As said above , Paul's rollers are not known for big gain figures, but i'd rather have the truth than some silly inflated figures

leon

How can you tell which RR's are overreading?? - You can't!

The most important thing is that future mods with accompanied power runs should be done at Pauls RR! -So to remain consistant.

I used the Dyno dynamics RR at Jap performance, it ran 188.6 so yeh a bit down on my best, but it was runnin Std fuel...Diff day aswell. - All factors make a difference.

Like you said, if it pulls like a train thats the main thing! Watch those extra Revs!!

 

[jimbo666]

my cup ran a 180.1bhp with 130ft/lb. thats with inlets, rs remap and hillpoer christ it feels like it too. much quicker than my old cup with the same mods.

 

[RSTuning]

I never had it RR as std mate.

As said above , Paul's rollers are not known for big gain figures, but i'd rather have the truth than some silly inflated figures

leon

How can you tell which RR's are overreading?? - You can't!

The most important thing is that future mods with accompanied power runs should be done at Pauls RR! -So to remain consistant.

I used the Dyno dynamics RR at Jap performance, it ran 188.6 so yeh a bit down on my best, but it was runnin Std fuel...Diff day aswell. - All factors make a difference.

Like you said, if it pulls like a train thats the main thing! Watch those extra Revs!!

Have you got the graph to hand mate? What does it say along the bottom?

This result is about right for a 1x2 on a dyno dynamics, very close to what i used to see at the racing line's dyno

Paul

 

[Chris n nic]

130 lbft? Thats well down fella...aren't they 144 std? I'll have to nip over and have a doo Paul.

Mine made 188bhp with 182 manifold, decat/exhaust BMC filter with cold air feed and std ecu. Remapped on same rollers 2hrs or so later and he got it to 195.4 with 175ftlb. 6 months later totally different rollers at a subaru RR day mine made 195bhp and 173 ftlb.

As has already been said RR results are only any good if you get a b4 and after reading on the same rollers on the same day to be any good at seeing increases but they are a good laugh!

Chris

Chris

 

[lasbazrre]

130 lbft? Thats well down fella...aren't they 144 std? I'll have to nip over and have a doo Paul.

Mine made 188bhp with 182 manifold, decat/exhaust BMC filter with cold air feed and std ecu. Remapped on same rollers 2hrs or so later and he got it to 195.4 with 175ftlb. 6 months later totally different rollers at a subaru RR day mine made 195bhp and 173 ftlb.

As has already been said RR results are only any good if you get a b4 and after reading on the same rollers on the same day to be any good at seeing increases but they are a good laugh!

Chris

Chris

There good gain's them mate, i don't think my car has been loosened up yet, i bought it off a middle aged man who wanted something nippy, and never "give it some"

From what ive found out reading threads/posts on here a 182 translates to 179 bhp? , and the overall opinion is that a cliosport will not make the 179bhp, so some mods will be needed to bring it up too std.

I never got it RR as std so i'll never know what it was putting out, but opinion ranges between 165-175bhp a 182 should be making as std?

I think my car was more towards the lower end of 165-175bhp, so if you look at it that way it's been money well spent!

Thanks

leon

 

[Weeman]

I had 356 at the wheels, car is standard, only slight mods were expensive screenwash and a packet of hula hoops in the glovebox, was pretty impressed tbh.

 

[gav182]

I had my standard car R/R about a month ago , apparently made 180bhp 152 ft/lb but 164bhp at the wheels using v power .

 

[-Make-]

mine, 185bhp@7454rpm & 159ft/lb@5300rpm
mods: jr-panel, n-ecu (bosch), own made ss-exhaust with devil bbox and highflow-cat.

 

[GordonD]

Haven't we all agreed yet that one dyno result means nothing, unfortunately. And the same with results from two different dynos.

One done before you did some modification(s), plus another one afterwards done on the same dyno, tells you what the modifications(s) achieved. And one done on one car, plus another done on the same dyno on another car, tells you which car is stronger.

Its bizarre. It shouldn't be like this. Its like taking your car to different weighbridges and getting different result. The law makes sure they all produce results to within a certain degree of accuracies. When is someone going to take dyno shops to court for deceptive and misleading practices. I suppose the problem is because we have no idea who is telling the truth and who are the liars.

 

[Chris n nic]

mine, 185bhp@7454rpm & 159ft/lb@5300rpm
mods: jr-panel, n-ecu (bosch), own made ss-exhaust with devil bbox and highflow-cat.

Wow thats a high peak power m8...think mine is down in the high 6k`s

Chris

 

[Johnc172]

As above - this debate has gone on for years and will carry on for years to come!! Each RR is different and means naff all! The only real benefit of an RR is to do a run before and after mods on the same RR, that way you can get the increase! Oh and for mapping ofcourse

As long as it's fast on road/track who cares!

 

[Andyman]

Even if it was running 200bhp it means F all on the open road if your car was lumping say 5 tons of ice about.
RR's are great for setting up your car and getting a rough idea of its power. How rough varys from palce to place obviously