Just picked up one of these cheap cheap from someone I know.
135-400mm (f4.5-f5.6), APO DG.
Read every review I could find before I got it, to make a decision. Most people were saying its slow to autofocus, is soft at 400mm, blah blah blah...Thought id' go for it anyway.
Sold my Canon 70-200f4 a while back now, just wasn't long enough, its good to have a bit more reach.
Its fairly heavy, quite a bit heavier on my 40d body, usable though. Autofocus is alot quicker than expected, does not really hunt much.Took a few snaps with it before, dull day, still very sharp wide open. Obviously its not going to be as sharp as a 300mmf2.8, but im not going to be blowing them upto billboard size so I think 5.6@400mm is adequate enough!
Its discontinued now apparently, was £450ish new back when It came out, I paid quite a bit less than half of that!
Overall im happy with it, especially with the bit more length...Will give it a try at some trackdays soon, see how it performs...
Anyone else had any experience with it?
135-400mm (f4.5-f5.6), APO DG.
Read every review I could find before I got it, to make a decision. Most people were saying its slow to autofocus, is soft at 400mm, blah blah blah...Thought id' go for it anyway.
Sold my Canon 70-200f4 a while back now, just wasn't long enough, its good to have a bit more reach.
Its fairly heavy, quite a bit heavier on my 40d body, usable though. Autofocus is alot quicker than expected, does not really hunt much.Took a few snaps with it before, dull day, still very sharp wide open. Obviously its not going to be as sharp as a 300mmf2.8, but im not going to be blowing them upto billboard size so I think 5.6@400mm is adequate enough!
Its discontinued now apparently, was £450ish new back when It came out, I paid quite a bit less than half of that!
Overall im happy with it, especially with the bit more length...Will give it a try at some trackdays soon, see how it performs...
Anyone else had any experience with it?