ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

SLR camera's



  S2 106 GTI
Which are good? been looking today at one Nikon D40x around £570 i think. don't want one very expensive cos i'm just at entery level!!
 

Christopher

ClioSport Club Member
  Z4M
i have a nikon d50, which the d40x replaces. a great camera

i paid top dollar when it came out too :(
 
B

Brown.

go the extra, nikon D200, been out a while, a year i think but 5frames a second and 10MP......doooo it!!!!!
 
D

dick

400d, i found um for £420 body only, then was gonna get the 28-135 IS lens to go with it and a cheap 70-300.
 
  Shed.
adjustable settings are the most important thing, amungst other things. With an slr you dont want to be getting any less than 10 mega pixels. I know with my point and shoot it has quite limited functionality. and i wish id have bought a d-slr instead. imo it takes some great shots but i need more from my photos. Only got 8Mega Pixlz. And i was taking these on soft snap.

http://www.webwarphole.com/CDG/plantshit.JPG
http://www.webwarphole.com/CDG/plantshit2.JPG
 
D

dick

whacking a good lens on a shite sensor aint gonna get u ote tho is it.
 

dk

  911 GTS Cab
these were taken at 8pm last night with the sun nearly at the horizon with no tripod with a canon 350d and a 70-200 F4 L lens.

http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=220463

Everything was against me including time but with the right equipment i managed to get some decent shots, thats from an old model camera with just 8mp too ;)

I would get the 400d with my money with todays range of cameras for a beginner.
 

dk

  911 GTS Cab
whacking a good lens on a shite sensor aint gonna get u ote tho is it.
define a poor sensor though, none of the cameras above have poor sensors, but only the canon take the canon L series lens which is exactly why i went for it, if its good enough for the pro's!

And i can confirm that with the same sensor the glass makes a massive difference on the quality of the shot.
 
D

dick

nah mate, im nt talking about SLRs,

was talking to the michael dude as he hasnt got an SLR, just saying thats perhaps the biggest difference. as a lot of p&s do have adjustable settings.

ive just got a fz50, i did have a 400d and 28-135 IS, but took it back thout f**k it id rather take my Fz50 to africa than have 2 cameras and not go anywhere.

noise on the fz50 sooo much higer than the 400d tho. o well. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:

dk

  911 GTS Cab
nah mate, im nt talking about SLRs,

was talking to the michael dude as he hasnt got an SLR, just saying thats perhaps the biggest difference. as a lot of p&s do have adjustable settings.
ahhhhh i see
 
  Monaro VXR
Just recently bought a 400D when comparing them side by side for similar features etc the canons just seems better value for money plus better lenses.
 
  Rally bus
don't be fooled by "the more pixels the better" cos that's bollox! It's no good having 10.2 million billion pixels if they are all blurred!

Canon/Nikon offer similar performance, what lens you stick on the camera makes the difference. I'd suggest trying a 400D (or whatever the entry level Canon is called this week) and the equivalent Nikon in a shop and seeing which feels the best to use... some people I know have said the Canon body is too small to be comfortable.

I use Nikon stuff :)
 
D

dick

nah karl zeiss arent that expensive afaik, think its sum nokia dual branding overhyping. altho im nt a massive photo buff.

seen canon lenses going for £7k+ n thnat was just jessops, dread to think how much proppa mental ones are <gulp>
 
D

dick

i know my mate showed me some camera make that was like 26 megapixels hahah
 
  S2 106 GTI
don't be fooled by "the more pixels the better" cos that's bollox! It's no good having 10.2 million billion pixels if they are all blurred!

Canon/Nikon offer similar performance, what lens you stick on the camera makes the difference. I'd suggest trying a 400D (or whatever the entry level Canon is called this week) and the equivalent Nikon in a shop and seeing which feels the best to use... some people I know have said the Canon body is too small to be comfortable.

I use Nikon stuff :)

another bonus to the nikon i was looking at was, on the camera it had a info button ..... so instead of looking through the destructions at what it means you simply press the info button and it tells you! fairly handy i thought.
 
  See My Clio? Tell Me
im looking into a slr too but not really wanting to spend 400 quid ive seen the Fuji FinePix S9600 for 250 what do you think to that is it worth the coin? ive gotta stop relying on the phone for pictures lol
 
D

dick

im looking into a slr too but not really wanting to spend 400 quid ive seen the Fuji FinePix S9600 for 250 what do you think to that is it worth the coin? ive gotta stop relying on the phone for pictures lol


u looked at the fz50? ther bout £285ish..

and u would NEVER be spending £400 on a dlsr, ud be buying more lenses a lot which is why ive held off til after ive been to africa in the summer :D
 


Top