Some good sense in there. However, dont presume that the PS3 will have such a dramatic impact on the console market as PS2 did. Firstly - this time around Microsoft don't just have a foot in the door (Xbox), they're sitting infront of the fire sipping brandy. Second - do people really want all-in-one home systems? The presumtion is that sooner or later PS3 will take market dominance like of the same magnitude as the PS2. That is not a sensible view IMO.
Personally I am not overly bothered over the PS3 vs. X360 argument. Mainly because all I want is good games, and also because I'm a PC gamer who can't be arsed to get back in to the console world just now.
Indeed I welcome the fact that there is a
three horse race (you forgot about little old Nintendo), it's good for the consumer and it ensures each party on their feet and working hard to maintain or steal margins from the competition.
However I notice that the title is "biggest loss in 4 years" well when you think that the R&D/production/marketing/materials/distibution of the PS3 all will have fallen in 2005-2006 then there really is little surprise.
The PS2 sales are dwindling, and for the first time in 1/2 a decade Sony have a gap in their product in which the PS2 is no longer meeting expectation, and the PS3 hasn't yet received the development time it needs to churn out some essential titles.
I don't think they'll be any pay cuts or redundancy at Sony because of these figures, nor do I think they'll be cutting back on the free Klix coffee.
People love a david and goliath story, I personally have little love for Sony myself after the stunt they pulled on Lik-Sang but it doesn't stop me seeing what a good product the PS3 is, and what it can strive to be.
Within 5 years I think they'll be muchos laughter from Sony about these statistics.