ForceIndia
ClioSport Club Member
Gentlemans spec 200
Had it over a week now, put some miles under the wheels, mix of every road type possible! Very happy so far.
Speed wise, it still feels tight, but not far off the pace of my prev ph1 172. The cabin and build is in a different league, penalty being a massive weight increase. Driving position is good, steering wheel is too thick for me (thinking of changing for an r26 wheel). Steering is average. Well weighted and uber accurate, but devoid of feel. Very similar to a mk5 golf gti in that respect.
Gearshift is better than any of the mk2's I owned, just as well as the short gearing means I'm using it a lot!! Throttle response is as per for fbw, I feel like I'm driving in someone elses hiking boots lol. In short, compared to cable, it's crap. Horrible, worst aspect of the car.
Mpg I'm averaging 29, so about 10% worse than the ph1. To be expected given the weight.
Motorway/a-roads it's a more enjoyable car than the 172/trophy. Comfy, grippy, but less agile. Makes up for it by being more stable and precise. On b roads, the 172/trophy is more fun, 100%. I think the 200 can carry more speed, but its less enjoyable despite that.
Overall, asked to pick between a trophy and the 200, I think I'd still prefer the trophy, just! It's more fun, and it feels more special. The best way I could put it, the 200 is the better all round car, the trophy is a better performance car.
Speed wise, it still feels tight, but not far off the pace of my prev ph1 172. The cabin and build is in a different league, penalty being a massive weight increase. Driving position is good, steering wheel is too thick for me (thinking of changing for an r26 wheel). Steering is average. Well weighted and uber accurate, but devoid of feel. Very similar to a mk5 golf gti in that respect.
Gearshift is better than any of the mk2's I owned, just as well as the short gearing means I'm using it a lot!! Throttle response is as per for fbw, I feel like I'm driving in someone elses hiking boots lol. In short, compared to cable, it's crap. Horrible, worst aspect of the car.
Mpg I'm averaging 29, so about 10% worse than the ph1. To be expected given the weight.
Motorway/a-roads it's a more enjoyable car than the 172/trophy. Comfy, grippy, but less agile. Makes up for it by being more stable and precise. On b roads, the 172/trophy is more fun, 100%. I think the 200 can carry more speed, but its less enjoyable despite that.
Overall, asked to pick between a trophy and the 200, I think I'd still prefer the trophy, just! It's more fun, and it feels more special. The best way I could put it, the 200 is the better all round car, the trophy is a better performance car.