How is this any different to the comparison of spending £300 on an iPad which does exactly (less actually) what your laptop does so well? Why would you buy one? All it gives you is convenience and speed in a slightly watered down version of what you already have...the same as these 'watches' do.
I'm amazed at the lack of buy-in to these. I bet if Apple were the first to come out with it instead of it being a 3rd gen offering after Samsung have had a couple of unsuccessful tries, the Apple world would have got right behind them, amazing, innovative, go Apple...
But the iPad does everything that a computer does for pretty much all casual computer users, it's a no brainer, it's way better than sitting in the corner of the room with a desktop. It's better than a laptop because the battery lasts longer, it's lighter, it's easy to hold and so forth.
For most users it's just better than a computer in every which conceivable way.
The watch is odd though, it just seems like tech for techs sake. It doesn't solve a problem, great I can tap a contact and make their watch vibrate or I can read a text on it, on a tiny screen...I can even answer a call....and then get my phone out of my pocket to actually talk to the person, umm....
The beauty of a watch is that you know that if you look at it the chances of it working are high, if it's battery operated you replace the battery every couple of years...if it's wind up, you wind it up every so often. We don't know what the battery life on this watch is going to be, but it's going to be poor, what's the point in having a watch that when you look at it the batteries dead?
I was one of the people that "got" the iPad, where it fitted, why it was going to rule the world....I just don't see it with this....it's creating solutions to problems (and creating it's own problems along the way) that don't exist.
Jony Ive looked like a dick wearing one. Tim Cook looked like a dick wearing one. Joe public will look like a dick wearing one.