turbo

[Tom]

yes.

 

[David]

same sort of power increase? or more?

 

[Tom]

No point again. 172 engine would be cheaper

 

[Bryan]

but then you have the suspension issues, the fact that it all has to be changed, brakes etc etc

in other words, stop faffing around and buy a 172, it will work out cheaper

 

[McBunny]

torsion wouldnt even entertain doing the twin engine conversion to my 172 imho they suck

 

[Tom]

really

they do suck

Clio 344 would rule!!

 

[David]

I jsut fancy the only clio 1.6 turbo in the country! Was thinkin of aquiring a 911 porsche badge (the turbo bit) and putting it under the clio badge on the rear...cant do it though unless i have a turbo... ( looks like my plans may fail....

 

[McBunny]

that would also have been either turbo or sc twin engined one with n2o so lets say clio 600 9 seconds to 100 not too hard lol

 

[MaLicE]

dogmaul call ep motorsport they will do it for sure, will cost ya like 8 grand pluss though ....



and spirez maybee u should find things out before u just blert out stuff

 

[McBunny]

i have gone off the idea now tho it was a moment o madness but it has passed i will now leave it to roamer

 

[Fred@BTM]

Quote: Originally posted by RobFenn on 31 October 2003

Quote: Originally posted by Ben H on 30 October 2003


Theres being individual... and theres being stupid!

Id give you a pat on the back if you pulled it off mate..but i think we all know..youre not going to do it!

-Rob

Who are you calling stupid??

and Robbie, keep your eyes open laddo!!!!!

Yes i am stupid, and yes i enjoy throwing money down the toilet!!

See you both at York raceway in approx 12months!

 

[spirez]

well malice it was your friend zed who put the idea in my head on RSC. and fred, go for it! you only live once, eh

 

[MaLicE]

a) zed aint my friend i just know hime from rsc

b) never listen to ne thing he says