That suprises me, if im honest i always try to stick with shell but there never seems to be enough of the garages about
Tescos are slowly taking over the world, soon this debate will be acedemic as petrol will only come from tesco probably, lol
That suprises me, if im honest i always try to stick with shell but there never seems to be enough of the garages about
What dyno is that on then Danny?
Cause if its a dyno dynamics like surrey rolling road use, then they dont actually measure losses they just apply a fixed guess percentage for all FWD cars.
Tescos are slowly taking over the world, soon this debate will be acedemic as petrol will only come from tesco probably, lol
SuperFlow AutoDyn 11
Althought i made the same results at Surrey as i did on the above dyno regardless of how the tranmission loss was calculated.
how about cheap fuel and some additive?
i guess you didn't see the 5th gear test then. :nono:
Sure didn't.
what was their take on the matter?
Why would anyone not put the best petrol they can in their cars?
When you have an engine like the f4r which occasionally suffers from valve failure, it seems a pointless exercise to increase the chances of that happening by running a fuel that may cause knock under certain load conditions and risk causing them to fatigue quicker.
For the sake of 3p a litre, I'd stick with a super unleaded personally.
It wasn't a showcase. Its their own personal behind the scenes testing.Sounds like shell marketting worked well on you then, lol
I do agree with vpower being a good fuel, I just wouldnt trust the person selling it to give me independant results!
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, Tesco 99 is normal fuel with 5% ethanol added which increases the knock resistance of the fuel, but lowers its calorific value, so effectively its "watered down", if your car runs a little lean in places anyway, it could even lead to a misfire as a result.
What were the actual figures at each then at the fly and at the wheels out of interest?
Didnt get an ATW printout from Ktec, but Andy said it did 155WHP after the run.
Ktec ATF > http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q51/laine_16v/KTECATF.jpg
We back to back tested some 95 ron against vpower on a totally standard octavia VRS 1.8 20vT.
Logging knock and advance with VCDS the 95 was giving massive correction figures, 6 IIRC over all 4 cylinders and 165hp. We drained the fuel while still on the dyno and filled with vpower. The same logs were taken, this time with 0 correction at WOT and an extra 10hp and 10lbft all over.
Be interesting to find out what would happen on a N/A car. I was allways under the impression turbo cars did perform better with the higher octane stuff