ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

which would you buy



Status
Not open for further replies.
  pb ph2 172
as my tyres are now fubared im looking at a new set and have narrowed it down to 3
conti sports
pirelli p zero nero
goodyear efficent grip
what experience has people had with these
 
  pb ph2 172
dont want michelins
i found bridgestones better , they lasted longer , cornering speeds were faster , they broke away progressivly when pushed to there limit
tbh i found michelins s**t even hankooks were 10x better
i can get any of those above for £200 a set fitted
 
  RS6 C7
Out of those conti's by far, they last well, grip perfect and are decent in the wet.

Ive got them fitted to all my cars.

Which michelins did you have though as some of them are s**t..
 
  pb ph2 172
my bridgestones are 205s so was the the michelin exaltos but as ive got spacers on now they just catch the archliner under hard conering
hence why i was going back to 195s
ive always found michelin are only recomended because people say they are the best just from word alone
i had ps3s on my golf but found pirellis to be better
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Top