Darren S said:PCs all the way as far as I'm concerned. Millions of utilities, programs, games, various hardware add-ons, upgrades, integrations, you name it.
Consoles just make me laugh with the hype and the bell-ends that queue-up for 52 hours in order to get their mitts on one. They have their advantages - small, mobile and powerful (for the moment). But it's a never-ending cycle - the PS2 was powerful on its release but any PC worth mentioning could chew it up and spit it out. The same goes for the XBox.
D.
McBunny said:also there is already ,oves afoot to get linux onto the 360
Loony said:You change consoles once every 3/4 ish years. even if you buy a topspec PC give it a couple of months and you'll be having to check requirements or run at slower speeds/lower detail. Give it 2 years and you'll more than likey be struggling to run decent new games. You can walk in any shop and pick up an xbox/PS etc title not have to look at the back and know A. it will run and B. it will run how its meant to. Granted it once its a year into its life it wont be as good as the current high end PC but then you'd be having to constantly upgrade or replace the PC to keep it this way.
Dont get me wrong for certain games they are better but if you want to spend £300ish on something to play games and not worry about it for 4 years get a console. if you want the best graphics etc then replace your pc every year or upgrade it constantly and a continual and not insignificant cost get the PC, horses for courses IMO.
Loony said:You change consoles once every 3/4 ish years. even if you buy a topspec PC give it a couple of months and you'll be having to check requirements or run at slower speeds/lower detail. Give it 2 years and you'll more than likey be struggling to run decent new games. You can walk in any shop and pick up an xbox/PS etc title not have to look at the back and know A. it will run and B. it will run how its meant to. Granted it once its a year into its life it wont be as good as the current high end PC but then you'd be having to constantly upgrade or replace the PC to keep it this way.
Dont get me wrong for certain games they are better but if you want to spend £300ish on something to play games and not worry about it for 4 years get a console. if you want the best graphics etc then replace your pc every year or upgrade it constantly and a continual and not insignificant cost get the PC, horses for courses IMO.
sn00p said:My money would be on Microsoft this time round.
It shouldn't have been very difficult this time round to prevent unauthorised binaries running.
wozzaa said:Well technically the 360 is massively supperior to any normal games machine out right now.
Remember underneath it its got a triple cored 3.2 ghz system and each core basically has hyper threading although not called that.
If you could take that cpu and put it in a windows machine it would show you as having 6 seperate cpu's.
The graphics card is also more powerful than the current X1800XT. So put it into comparison the 360 is capable of resolutions of 1920x1080 and still churning out large frames per second. Most pc's arent unless you have a very fast cpu and a couple graphics card running in sli / crossfire.
But i liek my pc for certain games mainly fps shooters etc. plus i need it for work.
McBunny said:there are lots of things in place to prevent things running trouble is if you know how it stops things running its not much harder to work out how to change it so other things will work.
some of the people doing the reverse engineering on the 360 are most probably just as clued up on whats going on than the people at microsoft
Lee said:Which begs the question why PGR3 is locked to 30fps because they couldn't get it to run consistently at 60fps even with all that power at their disposal?
Right, can someone please tell me WTF is "hyper threading"?wozzaa said:Well technically the 360 is massively supperior to any normal games machine out right now.
Remember underneith it its got a triple cored 3.2 ghz system and each core basically has hyper threading although not called that.
McBunny said:lol it was from wikipedia lol
i could explain it better but when you try it just sounds far too complicated
RSi Dave said:Personally i love driving games and prefer consoles for stuff like that, however like most FPS so prefer the PC for stuff like that.
I had a similar choice, it was get a 360 or buy a decent graphics card and some decent wheels for the nova.
i went for the second choice, mainly cos i had been wanting some decent alloys for ages and couldnt be arsed to wait for the 360.
Give me the choice again tho, and it probs would be different....
Darren S said:Console driving games are no match for a decent PC alternative, imo. Don't get me wrong, I've played Burnout on the X-Box and really liked GT4 on the PS2 - but after about an hour, I start to get bored. For all their graphical flashiness, lighting and mirror effects, they just feel 'flat'. It's like I'm playing a tarted-up arcade game from the early 90s...
I can play GTR (as an example) on the PC for around an hour and feel physically drained. The level of concentration required and ability of the game to 'draw you in' is amazing. It also helps having a decent steering wheel!
Of course, it's all relative. If you want a 30min blast while the missus is watching Corrie, then a cosnole will have the edge. For a proper driving game however, I'd always look to the PC.
D.
Clart said:thing is, if i got a 360 i'd want a big HDTV plasma or something