Search results

4

In reality... its more about the glass! My lens cost more than the body!

lol - so true!!!

Here are some D40 shots with 55-200 VR in overcast conditions, full size can be seen on my Flickr account. And with 18-55 Lens kit And nearly full size crop of the robin:

Good choice.... but if you can get the twin lens kit with the 55-200 VR, rather than non-VR.

+1!!! The 400D may have some fancy extras but it will not produce any better pics than the D40 (when using same spec lenses). Many prefer the D40 for its grip, ease of use and the quality of the kit lens. I'm not saying the D40 is better, its just a case of what people prefer. There is probably...

If you still need the film... give us a shout ;)

I really cant agree lol! In the flash the Corsa VXR just looks too high, too narrow and needs to go down! Smaller rims but looks much better lower IMO! http://www.thorneymotorsport.co.uk/tuning/Corsa_VXR_Tuning.shtml

Good lens, I used it for a while, i have some pics from it posted on this forum.

Corsa VXR just looks way too high! Thorney motorsport for your suspension FTW! There is an Arden Blue one in our showroom.... just needs to be lower, on another note, there is an astra Nurburg... which is really nice apart from the silly graphics!!

I have CS3 at home and at work but for what you want elements should be fine, CS3 is great though!

Just a quick one of the Revels Ride:

D40 with kit lens is £100 cheaper, then get the 55-200 VR for £130 and you have a great package that wiill take just as good pics as the D60. Thats just my opinion anyway!!

Very nice! Had a chop myself as bored!!

The 18-200 Nikon VR is a much better lens, and IMO is well worth the extra expense over the Sigma. Its costs around £120 more, but money that is well worth saving up for!!!

Its very poor in any light other than sunlight, its low light capabilities are way off the VR Nikon equivalents. Images are not very sharp, it struggles to auto focus, and even though I enjoyed using it, when I looked back at the images I took, the Nikon 55-200 VR pics were so much better. I...

Hellingly like a lot of old asylums is a listed building so it just site there. They built the new hospital round the back which is modern and much more secure! Trouble is, when the old Hillingly was closed, the new one was not built so some of the people in there were just let out!!

Its a shame they boarded it all up... its a massive place!

Its now been sold, but as Clart says... you will be lucky to get one for £150! Plus i cant see it getting shots like the ones already posted.

I went in to the old Hellingly Asylum (Hellingly Hospital) about 8 years a go.... would love to go back with my camera now but its got guard dogs and CCTV around the place now... bugger! Someone got some good pics though: http://www.abandoned-britain.com/PP/hellingly/1.htm Dead creepy inside...

You could buy mine... if you had a Nikon!

Nikon D40 Robin... no crop: :)

Canons are for people who need an image to make themselves look good. Nikon are for true to themselves photographers... gay, straight or bi ;) (I also ditched the d40 lens kit... although superior to the 400d's)

Tough one!!!

^^ nice! Will take a pic of mine later. Poor D40 body... does not know whats hit it!!

Just been trying a few indoor shots with the OS on and off, better than i thought it would be TBH!!

^^ true about the AF-S 50, would do very well I think. The seller even sent me a free UV filter.... which is going in the bin as the quality of it is... well... crap!

My 18-200 arrived today... £230 and 2 days to deliver. No tax either :)

I was looking at the Nikon 18-200VR but from Honk Kong it was still near £400... The sigma came in at £230 delivered. Its a heavy beast (600g) but feels very solid and well built. Has zoom lock too which is a bonus at the Nikon has quite bad lens creep. Upside... ap starts at 3.5.... downside...