Search results

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40/users-guide/index.htm http://www.nikondigital.com/d40_digitutor/eng/d40/index.shtml http://www.canon.com.au/eos/tips/shootingpanoramas.aspx http://web.canon.jp/imaging/enjoydslr/index.html

yeah, the AF-S lens are slightly more expensive, but unless you're planning to buy s**t loads of em, i doubt you'll notice really. Also manual focusing can be fun - when you a shot right, you get more of a sense of acheivement

yep, the 50mm is a quality lens, so sharp

the lens kit is awesome. takes great pics straight from the box. Just buy a quick 2gb card, UV and polorising filter and you'll be busy for a long time....

i had a nice race with a 530d the other day. It was quicker than i imagined

the ph- stickers are so last year. try something original?

great pics mate

moron

i think they're a complete waste of money

1996 i got one of these but before that i had a oooo the coolness

i got a jessops pro one from ebay - cost about £9

why what you done to it?

did i say they didn't? I certainly don't race my mates at what looks like double the speedlimit.... Whats your point?

Erm thats not me

i've been with o2 for year and never had problems. My wife changed to orange a couple of years ago and they were fcuking appaling!

the nikon 50mm f1.8 is a bargin at £60 - manual focus, but its not hard really

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3Cl-c5rp90 What a bunch of complete wombles

tried a couple tonight on the way home

too much time on your hands?

you'll always get shutter lag with a compact. i wouldn't want to take a DSLR on a night out with me. My K850i goes up to iso400, which takes surprisingly good pics

erm why?

well that doesn't work

If fed a true HD 1080p source, yeah you might just be able to tell. If you can afford it get the best you can

you won't notice the difference in resolution at 37". 50" maybe

no point getting 1080p on a 37 inch tv tosh 37WLT66 owner for a year, no problems whatsoever, really happy!

so how often do you actually shoot "properly" and in raw? IMO you can acheive perfectly fine results with jpegs

http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=279409

lol "you shouldn't be shooting more than iso 200" Thats not really a valid arguement really, because we all need to do it, to achieve better results. Lets face it, we're not pro's and we can't afford to spend thousands on lenses!

if you're going over 40", its got to be plasma and 1080p

agreed