Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
My 182 had no warranty claims in 15k!! But the feel on VAG cars is 10x better than my clio. Its the same as my hire car, Mk V Golf, the finish, switch gear, interior in general is so much better and people even comment on its touches!!
Theres not much differrent between the 210 and 225. The only differences is the 225 has sculptured mirros and a red line on the steering wheel and a tracker. There is no other differences.
I loved my LCR, quite a different beast though. The 182 is proper hot hatch, light nimble, squirt and...
Would be a tough one. Think I would probably be evo for that kind of money.
If I had to choose, would probably be the focus, as is more of a drivers car.
Yeh, paddy, name from the past!! Didnt realise who you was until I saw it on the bowling screen.
Sorry missed you Lee, was unfortunate, blame the harvester pub!!
Dont think its top strut on 182 mate, cos this was sorted on that 182 phase. The top strut is a 172 issue. Also top strut would knock ubder harsh acceleration/loss of traction
I can vouch Maz's 182 doesnt knock under harsh acceleration!!!:rasp: I did my best to discover if it yesterday!!!:D
Leon Cupra R.
I have driven all three and owned an LCR, 172&182. The RSclio has a fun factor that the LCR didnt match, the clios nimble and a little bit more raw in terms of driving. The clio is cheaper to run (hence why I returned). Parts and fuel are significantly more expensive on th LCR...