EVOgone said:RS is a far better drivers car plus 500 quid and 270bhp...!
V6 is a better car for looks / pose but the RS isnt bad either.....
Floodie said:no thats not really the beauty of the clio... you have to fork out a good couple of grand at least just to get the thing over 200bhp
blaze said:No one seems to make any sense nor actually realise the vehicles. The Focus RS has been superceeded by the new Focus ST (and a hell of a lot cheaper given you're car). It's also quicker round a circuit. The V6 will without doubt be quicker still and has been proven. The RS was not ever the car Ford intended it to be. It was not much quicker than a cupped Clio (FFS they had to reel in the torque to make it move). This is from a company that said it was so awesome in every department.
Boy racer pub talk is as useless as a chocolate fireguard.
The best read is Autocar. At least they print their tests and what they involve. Look at the back to see the huge efforts to rationialise the reports.
Boys oh boys
gazcaddy said:I think your wrong, The RS was faster round top gear test track than the new ST, also a number of magazines raved about the RS, top gear in particular
tommyc said:270bhp, is that true? sounds pretty good just from a £500 chip, what does a focus start with 220bhp?
Martin_89 said:ive only been in an ST170 not an RS but even the grip that had amazed me, the RS is ment to be even better.
Martin_89 said:ive only been in an ST170 not an RS but even the grip that had amazed me, the RS is ment to be even better.