Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
how come ktec sell all the parts most people really want i.e they listen to what people need, spend the time to develop them and then over price them by around 15%
its a shame as some of there things are really good
sao if there only 20% on the back (and look nearly blacked on those pics) how come the front 2 look lighter ?? and there on 30% is it because the windows already have slight tints on the clio`s or did you just get the figures mixed up
edit: of is 10% almost blacked and 90% almost completley...
really nice. From first inspection it needs the following, a sport badge, 20-40mm spacers to bring the wheels out more as it still has dynamique style track width (first thing always gives an RS away is its wide track and low stance)
finally 182 spoiler and you will have a minter looking car
..got your attention about TINTS.
ok my cup would look meaner with some rear tints and very mild side front tints perhaps ? thing is i dont want a Van look or a blacked out look, but the current tints (which look less than my last MKII172) arent dark enough..
what percentage is best for a...
most of these cars are designed for smooth european roads, most of these suspension kit arrive from america or europe also designed for the smooth tarmac and lowered look.
in this country I have acknowlaged that 80-90% of all roads i travel on to work apart from the dual carigeway are uneven...
all depends on road type, seen ford focus keep corner speed with some really decent cars due to their exellent balance and ability to soak up bump at speed, ive run a 172 on hard suspension (thankfully with ride adjustment) and on firm setting yes it was incredible on smooth even half decent...
i dont get hwo they were sat in a car test driving it set on fire so they jumped out and produced (if you see the full versions) better pictures than i have ever done
really top quality, not some grainy mobile phone shot ???
white teg past me on my local bypass the other day, never seen anything shift so fast for such little hp but considering their relative lightweight and real world hp doesnt suprise me to see them shift
agree, but people dont want extra power at 100mph, they want it accelarating upto that ammount using torque power which conversley the kits lose but gain in BHP terms so top end is fine but low end accelaration which is a slight flaw with the 172 (not so much the 182) is furher blunted by these...
get bucket seats with custom subframes, they can be slided and tilted (although not reclined) so people can still get in the back, big weight saving and argubly better for harnesses... also massivley cheaper
why ? no point going light the new RS is only 20cm`s shorter than the current Megane !!! its 2nd longest supermini in the world now and weighs around 1160-1180kg`s (172 cup 1020kg) (182cup 1070kg)
just for reference i was reffering to my old 172, i now own a cup (which feels faster) dunno if 160bhp is from a 182 but i would imagine by the same token 160 is possible from a stock 172 then 170bhp is possible from a 182.. maybe 160 on a 182 is taking it too far, perhaps 165 bhp on the worst...