Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I feel a bit bad leaving this here, incase anyone is stupid enough to do it.
Although you'd be doing everyone a favour, do not put copper grease anywhere on the disc faces.
It costs me £70 on average to fill mine up. That normally gets me between 220 and 250 miles, depending how I've driven.
I don't do as many miles as I used to! I used to spend around £500 a month on petrol in the Clio!
The bumper will attach with clips under the wings.
im going to guess that the pipe you've removed is for the radiator, not the intercooler, which means it should be full of water.
Road tax doesn't repair your local roads. Each county's roads are paid for by council tax.
Your road tax has probably helped maintain the London Underground, or paid for a library somewhere.
A phase 1 172 airbox and filter is the one everyone raves about.
In reality it makes no difference whatsoever. I'd just source a replacement airbox and OE filter.
Good to hear you're sticking with the bi-turbo setup. Much easier and more cost effective to get power from.
Engines are quite happy to take 400+bhp, and sound amazing revving out to 7,000rpm!
If the 300mm disk and the 280mm disk are the same width then that's fine.
the 300mm disk would provide better cooling than the 280mm disk. You mentioned previously that a thicker 280mm would be better than a thinner one, since it could store more heat, but that's just not the case. If anything...
My only issue here is the idea that a larger disk will somehow manage heat better.
All a larger disk will do is take longer to cool down between braking. A disk with a larger surface area relative to its volume would work better, be it 300mm, 280mm or 4,000mm.