Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
only reason I ask about ECU, and i do apologise for not seeing this info, is the trigger pattern on the fly.
It could be worked arround easy enough tho.
Glad youve got it fitted! as above, just slacken the 10mm's enough to allow movement of the plenum, and adjust so the lines match, then tighten...job done!
there are easy enough calcs which include valve open period and speed of sound, to obtain a length for a specific pulse return at a specific rpm...they however realy on assumptions such as constant temps , and so pulse propogation. they dont however include harmonics affected by plenum...
read what ive put above.....it looks like its been strapped down too much.
if that is the case, this will reduce the initial wheel data...i.e sap power. it will then increase rolling loss on coast down, and skew calculate there on.
LOL
looking at the graph data, they are using coast down to determine losses. If its been yanked onto the rollers, like most operators do (and shouldnt), then this is going to skew all data.
I would suggest you try another rolling road.
when did I say its never been said that gains are circa 10bhp??
as above, its been said regularly....just as regular as "gains vary" etc.
youve been unlucky Jajack
No body said they do though...yet in every thread they are mentioned, you say "dont bother" or similar.
Whats all this about rolling roads not telling you what you have?!
They can be very accurate and repeatable. Most set-ups have self correcting functions which automatically correct...