Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I made a solid stainless wishbone ( no bushes ) for the hillclimb car and that sorted it, but don't use it on the road as the vibrations in the cabin were mental.
If you live in America they're probably better, as Napa's ( US version of Andrew Page ) warranty is unbelievable, if you break something you ring them up and they just send a replacement out with your parts order the same day.
Here's your donor Jim
Mazda mx5 G-Ltd 1.8 Turbo.
Very quick little car!
Decided to sell this as is, as a running car instead of breaking it for parts for my other mx5 project.
1995 G-Ltd.
99713km.
240hp turbo kit. Mapped by evil tuning with printouts.
Switchable maps low and high boost with...
You're producing 13ft lb less than the op and only producing the same HP but at 1000rpm higher rpm
the argument towards against the RS2 is that 438's suit standard inlet manifolds as the long runner lengths work nicely with the high lift short duration of 438 timing but are nearing the upper...
fair enough. shorter intake runners will reduce mid range torque and that doesn't bode well with the 438 cams on standard timing marks, re-time them to 421 cam timing for a better match with something like a RS2.
personally id be going itb's and well ported head
You'll put in quicker times by spending money on a gripper and 5.1 CWP.
all you do by increasing power is move it up the rev range and spend the whole run in second gear (loosing time)