Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Sorry fella, but (and this just an opinion, from a bloke you'll probably never meet, over the internet, so, don't take it too harshly)
That is beyond gash.
I can't even think why you'd want them like that (well, I can, but I'm not going to start making presumptions). It's marginally better...
I'm just going to duct-tape an old phone to my helmet...like we planned to last time.
Also, iPod, constant repeat of The Chain
What is the format for the day anyway? Time as well or that matter.
@Scrooge, brace your sofa if it's an early start!
RON's are the most important bit, everything else is just marketing.
If anyone's THAT bothered about the condition f their engine innards, hit it with some redex every so often and be sure to "engine flush" when doing oil changes*
*: Unless you buy into the scares of engine flush bricking...
A tank of "regular" doesn't hurt, but it can take the ECU a couple of tankfuls of premium to remember how 98+ RONs work.
Also, you get a bit more MPG, which makes the 5p difference worthwhile.. in facft, it more than pays for itself..... or you get a little bit more top-end fizz, let your foot...
Most wise sir ;)
It's always a good statistic to unsheathe when council compulsive breeders moan about how they're so poor....but still fund 4 skanky mouth-breathers
Really?
I honestly thought the block was pretty much the same, meaning that, other than ECU changes, it could almost be a drop-in replacement for a 172 block?
Yes yes, cams, inlets etc. But the actual meat and bones of the thing, that's still the same 2.0l block that's kicked around forever...
Anything can fit, if someone was prepared to spend an exhorbitant amount of time on it, remember, the engine is, pretty much, the same as the 6-speed equipped 197s and 200s.
But, in a quick answer. No, it's not worth it.
182's will do 40mpg on a run all day, and the ratios are stacked well...
I'm looking at these quite seriously now.
Except that, much like the saxo, their piss-cheapiness had led to some abysmal JDM-chavism, the likes of which can only be equalled by a mk.1 1.6 MX5 with a UK VIN number and dildo shifter.
I mean, FFS, there's a garage selling what looked like a great...
All the non-24mth contract run the same principle.
£x per month - 0% finance for the phone, can be paid off at any time
AND
£x per month - Tariff
Tesco and Virgin mobile seem to only offer this option. It's not the worst idea, but they'll have a mark up on the handset cost
So I ring up T-Mobile, fully expecting to be rinsed for an S, but no.
6s, 64gb, Gold, no handset cost, £42 a month.
In fact, they wanted £20 for the 6, 64gb!
Cheer!
Well screw you apple.
within 24hrs of the 6s announcement, my 5 decides it likes to shutdown every time 5% of battery is used.
So, looks like it's a 6 for me.