Search results

don't worry too much though.... as if you want it off it needs to be pressed every time you start the car.... otherwise it automatically reverts to being on...

yeh i had universals to begin with and they go off centre while driving as there is nothing to keep them in the centre of the hub other than bolt tension... so you would be driving along a smooth road.. then the gear stick and steering wheel would vibrate like mad... then sometimes wouldn't...

20mm needs to be hubcentric.. i had mine just universal and they were terrible... and dangerous... got mine to match my sport wings from here http://www.performancefx.net/wsrenault.htm give them a call..

my 1.4 dynamique...

the motor is inside the car i think... on the left of the column.... could be mistaken...

so can it be used? or can the 4th mount not be attached? and do you know if the rack is compatible between phases?

you mean the camber?

well the shocker isn't going to change how its sticking out... the controls with where the wheel sits would be the lower arm or the subframe...

so my question is really.... is the mk1 172 same as the ph2 172? or if not are they compatible still?

but theyre the same for the ph1 and 2 172's? or compatible?

bump

is the steering rack on the ph1 172 the same as any other models? i understand the subframe is the same on all mk2 clios but isn't there a slight difference for the extra mount the sport has? thanks josh

it does depend on the car and the market.... A young lad doesn't really care if he can get one cat c/d for 3k for example if its a nice one with low miles.... I think if you have pics before to prove it was small damage. 50% is a bit of a silly figure.... for example an old landcruiser on cat...

repairable? or for parts? where is it at?

without a doubt.... wish i hadn't have done a single modification...

is it difinitely the whole screen and not just the backlight?

yeh be front subframe+lower arm job..

jesus thats mega pricey.. im sure i will be able to come by one eventually will just have to sit with the other unfinished 172 in the garage lol till i find one..

here are pics atm.....

its the angle....

yeh if you want to make money out of salvage on a long term basis like i am trying to do... if it is categorised you don't have a choice but to inform a buyer... if its cat X and a buyer doesn't ask then your not obliged to imo...

yes definitely... totally unfair and fraudulent... if people are buying a car imo they are entitled to know wether it is an insurance write off.. a flame one went on an auction on ebay (cat d) for 3000 with a decription in text talk lol...

lol credits are longer than the video...... sounds really good though....

great car.... much better colour than black imo... will look really good with euro rims and doesn't show dirt/imperfections like black does...

looks to be in a nice condition..... seems like the front bumper has been removed by the insurance assesors as all the undertray etc are just unclipped and has been unclipped from the wings... not in a position to view going to wack a bid in... think im just addicted to buying 2.0 french stuff i...

respect.... too funny... i like the white volvo who just follows round normally.. got some awsome skills...

just one im looking at buying to sell on one of the salvage sites... don't want to pay too much.. damage is ludicrously light just feel it will be murder finding front bumper other than a dealer.., not that i havent got enough on atm... with the cat X 172 im working on....

i havent bought it yet... subframe, lower arm, front bumper... possibly rack... so not extensive damage.. due to its age takes very little for it to become cat C

lol 5k.... your joking right?

what u lot reckon its worth... 2000 on an X flame red 40k miles..... all pics to show what it looked like before the repairs...