Search results

yes it is. but 3 up, a boot full of s**t, and full interior, against stripped, buckets, chipped, 1 up bodies vs charger......i know where my money would be going. kinda shows u the diff really. well..wen uv seen it in all specs.

lol...thats chris's cup....stripped, remap etc. we re-ran this the other week, 3 up in jons....the result was the complete opposite, jons disappeared quite quickly away from chris. ;)

when i find a better car to fulfill my needs i may be tempted to let go. ;)

but given the choice of 2.0 or 1.8 go for the 2.0 ........in time you will be converting to 2.0 anyway, so save a bit of time/money and plump for 1 straight away. imho.

not to mention hes let some of the harshest drivers loose in it for prolonged periods....and i mean real car breakers. and no......i havent broken it for him yet either. lol

aye with the mk 1 s tho just throw the r19 front box mount at it as well and it pretty much eradicates the prob. iv not had 1 fail with the extra mount in over the 4+ years iv had em. was nearly 1 a year before that.

aye iv owned several of both too. and fixed countless others. so if u want any advice or owt jus ask. always willing to give no BS straight forward answers. ;)

id say 2.0 evry time tbh. whether in valver or if you go for full fun package n go for the willy ;) in terms of speed, diff class tbh. loads more torque throughout the rev range with the williams, doesnt rev as high as std as the 1800, but then you dont really need it to, if its std, and the...

lol.....think he was meaning me mate. when theyv proven themselves to me to be a better car, then il admit it. std for std.....they arent tho. ;)

fair play then mate. your in a position to comment moreso then. maybe you would like to give an explanation as to why the ph1 is better in every way. each to their own mate. but we both know differently. maybe 1 day you will admit it to yourself ;)

have you even been in a williams let alone driven one??? i like how many ppl on here have an opinion on something theyv probably had no experience of......

well lets just say i was only a bit younger than you are now when i got mine......lol nigh on 8 years later, its still in my possession. ;) the ol14 postcode doesnt do any favours either....think even when i was less than 30 i was only paying £500 odd fully comp. but then i have had full...

i think its about 1 of the very very few that havent succumbed to the dreaded tinworm...........unfortunatey the other one doesnt have the same braggin rights.....its had 1 arch done. is 0159 the only 1 thats had no bodywork done at all in its near 100k life?? and keep hold of it.........u...

group 17 will do that mate. not cheap.............but worth evry penny. ;) btw...mine are fully comp..£340 .......guess thats what being old does for ya lol.

its been the same for the last 15 winters........wouldnt think this 1 will be any diff ;)

yeah fairly easily mate tbh. head gasket in just over an hour too. plenty of ppl have seen me do this..last one i did was gunners actually. would be able to do em quicker with a ramp etc, these times are all on the back street.

i like this 1 better lol YKKoFs3ajlM

and whatever you do..........dont buy one that has a hole in the roof......itl leak and rot the car from the inside. as above really, pas pumps are generally a little noisy, so if the 1 u look at has a noisy one, its no biggie. most things only take a couple hours to do on the car...

yeah he was bein a prick . i tried to go up the inside jus before the back straight , but u can see the instructors arm popping out the skylines window showing me the error of my ways lol.....i did actually get a warning for that, which was retracted at the insistence of one of the other...

i do have compassion for the newer renos....jons 172 is alrite...handles well, and puts a wry grin on my face evry time i drive it......but then........its quite heavily modified..and they need to be to be enjoyable to drive for me tbh. but as u say.diff opinions etc. its good to see a...

go on then could do with a good laugh.

and how do you get to that?? the williams is quicker, better poised, comfier, more economical, has larger boot space so is more practical, is just as reliable, handles better, has more driver feeling, less driver aids/hindrances. the list could go on.

u state the rs series get better as they go on. but yet u think the 172 is the better car. hows that work?? a little contradictive isnt it??

theres a line missing from what you quoted tho mate..... those that like to shag anything, be it male/female/animal drive trophy's ;)

so the 172 is now the better car??? im confused mate. the cars get better the newer they are...in models.....alledgedly.....so u took another step backwards...moving from the 172 to the trophy???

hehe

well done..........u want a medal??

but they are newer....so they must be better....whenever they were built they are still classed as newer, if registered later. how u can class the 172 better than a williams, and a 182 better than a 172, and a trophy better than a 182 is beyond me. the trophy and the williams are fairly...

so there were no more 182s registered after all the trophys?????? but the 197 is better.......so the extra money would have been well spent. ;) but for something to be better, means that whatever its better than, must be rubbish compared to the newer better thing no??

but the trophy s are rubbish compared to the 197....jamies logic says so. ;)